Am I right on this?:
Now I don't claim to be on either side of the fence and my intent is not to smear either side, but here are the "general" beliefs I see that is brought by both:
1) Libs claim to stick to the constitution, laws, and freedom of the nation, and want punishment of those who break them (even if it is the president). But in doing so, security can't be attained as effectively because laws can restrict critical security needs. They believe in freedom there is security.
2) Cons claim that security of the future is more important, and is more willing to attain it even at the expense of some freedoms and overstepping some laws, because they believe in security there is freedom.
P.S. Tell me if I have it right and give explanation to correct me. No insults plz. Thanks.
2007-03-16
06:37:26
·
7 answers
·
asked by
Jerry H
5
in
Politics & Government
➔ Other - Politics & Government