are un-circumcized penises always bigger than circumcized?
2007-03-16 06:31:46 · 15 answers · asked by wheelie181 1 in Health ➔ Men's Health
NO
2007-03-16 07:14:07 · answer #1 · answered by traveller 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
That has nothing to do with the size. Only skin is removed during a circumcision. And also for all of you out there, it doesn't matter whether a baby is circumsized or not, you still have to pull back the foreskin to clean them. The cut skin will attach itself to the head of the penis in sections if you don't. Both need to be kept clean daily. I have 2 sons, one is and one isn't. In fact you have to be very careful at first with the one who is, moreso than the one who isn't. One is no more cleaner than the other. Plus I have seen a few botched circumcisions, so for those of you who think a non circumcized male is nasty, you don't know what your talking about.
2007-03-16 17:27:33 · answer #2 · answered by Fruit Cake Lady 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes.
One hundred and two were circumcised, 43 were not, and two men did not answer. The uncircumcised penises had slightly larger circumferences, but the difference was not significant (2mm behind the coronal ridge and 4mm at the glans). There was a significant difference in length, with the uncircumcised men haing a mean length 8 mm greater than the circumcised (t=2.06, p<0.05). Insufficient residual foreskin in some circumcised men may have tethered their erections."
2007-03-16 19:04:45 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think they kinda look bigger when flacid becasue they have the extra skin on the end giving length to the flacid penis, but when the penis is erect then typically the fore skin is streched out kinda and not on the head of the penis therefore no longer giving it the extra length. so, i think when flacid they do look kinda longer but when erect i dont think there is a difference between un-circumcized and circumcized
2007-03-16 17:10:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Naturally the foreskin adds some bulk, but the variation between men is greater than that. What seems beyond dispute is that intact penises give more pleasure to their owners and their partners than cut ones: see http://www.healthcentral.com/drdean/408/60750.html
2007-03-16 13:50:49 · answer #5 · answered by Maple 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Whatever gave you that idea? Being uncircumcised doesn't necessarily mean that your penis will be bigger than someone who is circumcised. The average size is 5-7" for everyone.
2007-03-16 14:53:07 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No because penis size varies among men so really there is no way un-circumcised penises are bigger because size will vary among men.
2007-03-16 13:46:09 · answer #7 · answered by Jack C 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
in a study of identical twins
the uncut twin tended to be 1/4 inch longer
2007-03-16 13:53:44 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No difference in size between a circumsized and un-circumsized penis at all! Some are smaller...some are bigger...blah blah blah....and who cares anyway?
2007-03-18 12:07:00 · answer #9 · answered by doctor feelgood 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It would be smaller for circumsized guys, if there were bad doctors or jewish rabbiies that cut off way too much.
2007-03-16 15:00:43 · answer #10 · answered by DudeTrustMe 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
not necessarily. if you went around pulling guy's pants down, you'd find that sizes differ.. there are many uncut guys that are smaller than cut guys.. it depends on the person, not whether or not they are circumsized.
2007-03-16 14:41:29 · answer #11 · answered by Konrad 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋