don't we just send them another 20,000 so they can get the job done?
And if you tell me that we do not have that many left - shouldn't Bush have thought of that before he started this farce of a war in Iraq?
2007-03-16 06:24:28 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
How ever many are there when the job is finished, is your answer. If it takes 10-20 whatever years to win do it, just dont quit that is just what they want because they view americans as quitters. Winners dont quit.
2007-03-16 06:35:27 · answer #1 · answered by wezl4 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I don't support the war in Iraq but I'll offer up my number. I think that between 500,000 and 750,000 troops would do the job but Bush and his crew are not serious about doing a good job.
2007-03-16 14:06:29 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
as much as it takes to protect our troops. let those people take over and lets get our troops home.
2007-03-17 16:27:11 · answer #3 · answered by J 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
another 100,000 would do it I think.
2007-03-16 22:58:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Why can't they just leave well enough alone......???
2007-03-16 13:31:34 · answer #5 · answered by The Canadian 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋