I think a Obama / Edwards ticket would be better. Hillary can't be trusted.
2007-03-16 06:56:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by Stealth 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
Id sure rather see Obama than Clinton. Im amazed that Clinton is doing as well as she is- this is the Democrats big opportunity to take the Presidency back, but if they choose her, she's such a polarizing figure- so many Moderate (AKA Swing Voters) have such a strong negative reaction to her- I think that gives any Republican candidate a very good chance at going on to victory. Obama on the other hand can win a lot of swing voters, and would have a good shot at carrying the day for the Dems.
2007-03-16 06:27:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by bmwdriver11 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
I do, and I am Republican, because that is a sure fire way to make sure the Democrats lose in 2008.
There are enough people who would vote Democrat in the election because of their hate for the Bush administration that would no vote because they are sexist or racist.
Before libs start saying liberals aren't racist or sexist, talk to some 60 or 70 year old. They refer to African-Americans as "colored" or "*****", they don't think women should be working much less running for office. My grandfather has always voted democrat as long as I can remember except in 84. Why? Because Geraldine Ferraro was running for VP. He will not vote for Hillary. He would choose some right wing evangelical nut before her. He isn't the only one either, many people born in the 20's and 30's feel the same way. Not a lot, but a good enought chunk to swing many close states that would normally have gone to the Dems.
Think if only 5% don't vote dem, that is about 10% swing. Say it would be 54-46 dems, but 5% jumped because they were sexist OR racist, that would be 51-49 republican. Some states won't matter, NY, California, Mass and states like that will be Dem, the south and square states will go republican, its the others, Tennesse, Virginia, Ohio, Florida that will make the difference.
2007-03-16 06:40:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
I dont like the sound of that actually. anything with Hillary involved can take a hike as far as I am concerned. and Barack is a media fabrication who can speak well. so what. The media makes stars out of C list celebrities all the time. nothing new here. However, I like Obama WAY more than Clinton.
2007-03-16 06:40:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by Bistro 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
I like Obama, but don't think Clinton would take the VP.....you are going to get a bunch of responses from Republicsn who say both are evil.....one is a Clinton and the other is a muslim....lol, how pathetic.
2007-03-16 06:34:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
It wouldn't work at all. Hillary Clinton would not settle for VP. Obama/Edwards or Edwards/Obama would both be better.
2007-03-16 06:28:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I personally prefer an Obama/ Richardson ticket or one that would really throw people for a loop an Obama/Hagel ticket. Cross party lines, get the best people for the job.
2007-03-16 06:27:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by thequeenreigns 7
·
3⤊
3⤋
As a Republican, I'd LOVE to see either a OBAMA/CLINTON ticket or a CLINTON/OBAMA ticket.
Easy pickin's...
2007-03-16 06:51:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by Amer-I-Can 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
Either way sounds like the dream ticket for the GOP win.
2007-03-16 06:51:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Obana?...now let's get serious...other then been a new Senator=NO Experience; and "lots" just "lot's of lip-service"
to anyone whom is looking for it...check his statements and "record' for crying out loud.....what else can Obama offer to this nation?
What is the matter with you people anyway?....
you have totally lost your sense of properly "checking-out" a candidate?...instead of 'yapping" your non-sense here...use the I-net and find out just whom; you are yapping about...
...pathetic...just pathetic....
2007-03-16 06:59:49
·
answer #10
·
answered by dorianalways 4
·
2⤊
1⤋