a is clearly false. Scientists try to think up reasonable alternaties to their own hypotheses. It is always possible someone might come up with something they had simply not considered.
2007-03-16 06:10:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
A
A hypothesis is an educated GUESS - if an experiment fails to answer their guess, then they form a new hypothesis and try again. Hypotheses drive the experimentation process-there are always alternatives
2007-03-16 06:22:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by glazeddonut27 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
a - scientists must be open to any possible answer and must consider everything until that thing is proven wrong.
many experiments supporting a hypothesis does not make that hypothesis fact.
but one experiment DISPROVING the hypothesis loses all the credibility of that hypothesis
so, untill proven wrong, scientists must not assume that there is no resonable alternative to their hypothesis!
hope that is clear enough.
2007-03-16 06:12:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by Vidya 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
a. if there was not reasonable alternative to their hypothesis, what's the point of doing the experiment.
2007-03-16 06:14:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by sangreal 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
A. Scientists always try 2 disprove their stuff rather than prove it.
2007-03-16 06:09:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by mmmmmmm 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
a. There can be many different hypotheses to explain a phenomena, and a scientist stays open to them all.
2007-03-16 06:09:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by Peter G 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
a. There is no reasonable alternative to their hypothesis.
2007-03-16 06:09:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by j train 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
c. Only natural causes are involved.
2007-03-16 06:08:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm no scientist, but I would definitely guess "A".
2007-03-16 06:20:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by dunny456 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
E
2007-03-16 06:08:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by ijustdon'tknow 2
·
0⤊
0⤋