He confessed to every government conspiracy from 1974 all the way up to Septmber 11?
I mean c'mon, really ...A to Z?
2007-03-16 05:49:43 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Man they really pulled out all the stops on this one. I thought Osama bin Laden was the mastermind. They can't even decide which bad guy to pin all this stuff on. How stupid do they think we are? Pretty f*ckin stupid I guess.
2007-03-16 05:59:47 · update #1
I hear this guy mugged my grandmother in 1982. I want his head!
2007-03-16 05:53:01 · answer #1 · answered by aGhost2u 5 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Maybe timothy McVeigh was innocent too..... And what gave us the right to kill Zarkawi... Why is Bush trying to convince us that Iran means the threats its made against this country????
We all know that JiHad Jane and Susan Saranden have found out the nukes are for peaceful purposes only....
Being the mastermind behind 9/11 isn't enough ????
We obviously tortured him, right?Of course we all forget the picture they are showing all over TV is the same one they showed in 2003 when he was captured.. He's just telling us what we want to hear....lying about his conquests. One man couldn't possibly be responsible for all of that. Funny how every time we capture or kill an Al-Qaeda bigwig, Democrats downplay it as just one person. But in the same breath, they turn around and mock the Bush Administration for not capturing or killing Osama Bin Laden yet. Wait a minute...I thought he was just one man?
Now ask yourself this... Can he use this craziness in his defense.... absolutely. By confessing to some of these crime, is there a chance that others who have been tried and convicted for these same offenses, be released or retried?? Possible... Never underestimate the enemy....
2007-03-16 06:24:21 · answer #2 · answered by bereal1 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Quote from Wikipedia: "Van Auken is an entire time reporter for the international Socialist cyber web web page". interior the object, it states that parts of the documentation coping with torture have been blacked out. So there is not any techniques on such torture. Auken only assumes that, for the reason that there grow to be no techniques, there ought to have been torture. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed is a ruthless guy and could be punished to the fullest quantity of the regulation. We knew who this guy grow to be as quickly as we caught him. definitely everyone knew who this guy grow to be as quickly as we caught him. some human beings are so hell-bent on working down the Bush administration that they are prepared to assist absolutely everyone which could harm it, whether that guy or woman is a common terrorist and murderer.
2016-10-01 00:39:01 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It does seem awfully convenient.
Especially the timing -- just when the White House is suffering all these scandals, and when the Supreme Court is getting ready to hear (for the third time) arguments about detention practices......
Suddenly, everything the White House has done can be vindicated by a single individual. Who, by the way, did not confess during the months or years of being kept in secret prisons, but only confessed after his detention was revealed.
And who only confessed after the laws were changed (unconstitutionally) to allow coerced confessions to be used against him during military tribunals.
Just too many coincidences for me.
2007-03-16 05:54:53 · answer #4 · answered by coragryph 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
No, I don't buy it.
But who the heck started the email about Rosie O. being KSM in drag? Now everytime I see his pic, I think of Rosie and her hairy back. Not a good picture.
2007-03-16 05:55:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I heard that he even claimed to have killed John Lennon.
No, I don't believe anything that comes out of the Bush administration unless there is video evidence to support it and even then I'm not too sure about it.
2007-03-16 05:56:04 · answer #6 · answered by cheri b 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
you can get anyone to admit to anything with enough 'coercion'... since it's been interpreted to be different than 'torture'.
sure, he was probably involved... but, was he coerced to be the one to take the fall so we have someone to finally pin it on?
(I AM NOT defending)
also.. I thought ron jeremy was an adult film director/actor, not part of this extremist group
it is a rather convenient time for it to happen... was a rather convenient time when saddam was found in his rat hole also... talk about an 'ace in the hole'
2007-03-16 05:55:37 · answer #7 · answered by bilko_ca 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
He is an egoist.
Besides the value of a confession under torture is based on the expertise of the torturer!
2007-03-16 05:53:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I wonder who wrote the confession script: Cheney, or Gonzales.
Or maybe Rove...
2007-03-16 06:01:14 · answer #9 · answered by Truth 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Not at all. But I don't think it's so much do to the torture part.
He figures he's a goner anyway, and by taking the rap for his friends, he's protecting them.
any two-bit crook knows this game.
2007-03-16 05:55:50 · answer #10 · answered by Morey000 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Seeing pictures of him, the only torture he's undergoing is too many McDonalds 1/4 pounders with cheese. lol
2007-03-16 05:54:20 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋