Strength or Stability?
2007-03-16 05:43:01 · 8 answers · asked by aphotic nostrum 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Strength does not bring stability, if it did the USSR would never have fell.
Stability does not bring strength either, point in case is Cuba, they are stable, but weak.
Stability brings the possibility of co-operation, and that can bring strength. If used correctly strength can change the stability factor for good or bad.
These seem to be co-dependent things, it is hard to have one without the other for any length of time.
Wisdom is needed to maintain stability and to manage strength in a moral way. So my vote is for wisdom - which usa seems to be lacking completey...
2007-03-16 05:57:32 · answer #1 · answered by twilightinsanity 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Strength brings stability.
2007-03-16 12:47:11 · answer #2 · answered by kittenbrower 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Strength...
with strength comes stability
2007-03-16 12:51:10 · answer #3 · answered by nothing 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Respecting Country Head. Whether u like or Not Voted, but being People's Majority Idol, Respect and Lawbinding is must as a Resposible citizen of a country.
2007-03-16 13:04:28 · answer #4 · answered by kumar 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think that stability is more important for a country because without a stable government it can't be strong because if any disturbance or argument arises the system on which the government stands on would crumble
2007-03-16 12:55:23 · answer #5 · answered by MECD 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
stability. Many countries function without a strong military.
2007-03-16 12:47:40 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Stability! *sm*
2007-03-16 12:53:23 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Freedom and strength in honest leadership.
2007-03-16 12:55:35 · answer #8 · answered by katydid 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋