If you voted for Bush twice, why and do you know how to read? Do you think or a blind follower. Just curious..

Answer 1

I voted for Bush twice and if he were the only one with a shot running against the anti-war socialist commies, I would vote for him again. Did you vote for Kerry? (HA, HA, Ha!)

Answer 2

I voted for Bush twice, because the only alternative was Kerry/Edwards (Lurch/No Name), and they never said what they stood for, they only bashed Bush and Cheney.

And yes I can read, and I am not a blind follower. I watched every debate, and read the polls, and did major research on the candidates.

Let me pose a question to you.....Why are you such a follower, every liberal tree hugger makes the same statement, do you all share the same brain cell, or is it that you all live in the same commune????

Answer 3

Let me answer your question directly, and without sarcasm.

Let's imagine you are on a deserted island, and a huge storm is coming your way. You have three groups: Alpha, Beta, and Delta.

Alpha group decides the best course of action is to hide in some cliff side caves, because it provides sturdy protection.

Beta group is concerned there may be hidden dangers in the cave, like snakes or spiders, and wants to hide in a seaside grotto. Alpha group doesn't like that idea because, they reason, the storm will swell the water level and they will drown. Beta group disagrees.

Delta group thinks that just building a light shed in the forest is fine because, in their estimation, the wood has a lot of spring to it, and will not break in high wind.

If each group keeps arguing about what is best to do, the storm will strike while each course of action is only half completed, and they won't have any shelter.

So you see, even if you don't think Bush is taking the best course of action, sometimes you need to stick to one, imperfect plan. It is better than jumping around from one approach to the next. And often, a plan of action develops over the course of time, and sticking to it is the best course of action.

Answer 4

Well, you don't seem to know basic grammar or you wouldn't have written a run on sentence! SO, better check yourself before you have a go at anyone else.
But Bush was BY FAR the best choice twice compared to the numnuts running against him: let's see we had a basset hound-faced man whose wife ran him, and his not too masculine side kick--combing his hair all the time. Who else could we have voted for? Bush has the courage of his convictions and he's not wishy-washy like the democrats candidates.
I think the blind leading the blind is the Democratic mantra!! lol.....

Answer 5

I do not vote for a President because of what party they are or because everyone else is telling me too. I simply did not vote for Bush. I didn't vote for the other guy either - both times. I will vote for the candidate who has the most character and who votes for issues that are important to me.

At this time the only potential candidate that would get my vote would be Fred Thompson.

Answer 6

Unlike some people I considered who was his opposition and in both elections the choices were not as good as He was. I do not regret my choice as the others have proved how unrealistic they are and in Kerry's case how unpatriotic he is. Gore is just a space cadet fining new ways to live off the people while Kerry moves more to the radical left than ever. His attacks on the honor of our service-members is not very short of treason. Naturally his inability to determine what is real from fiction comes to light very often. Think about that.

Answer 7

yes I did vote for Bush twice, and i can read well enough to see you don't know enough to get out of the rain. Just curious.

Answer 8

Why? Because the only alternatives were Gore or Kerry, two totally useless oxygen suckers with nothing to offer America but lies and leftist crap.

I was very disappointed that Bush was the 2000 GOP nominee, because he was a very flawed candidate, IMO. But compared to his competition - McCain and then Gore - he was head and shoulders better then they were.

Bush has done several things that I agree with - tax cuts, war on terror, Supreme Court selections - and a number of things I disagree with - steel tariffs, NCLB, welfare prescriptions, failure to address the illegal alien issue.

I also dislike his failure to use his office to chastise his detractors and the surrender monkeys.

I think one of his greatest faults is he trusts his appointees too much, and is the last one to see the incompetence some of them display. His management style, which is to hire good people and let them do their job only works when the people hired are competent for the specific job. (i.e. Harriet Miers was a good WH counsel, but not a good Supreme nominee).

But we've come to this point because the Democrats have embraced Socialism and some of the most incompetent and corrupt liars as their candidates.

Answer 9

I find it very interesting that instead of discussing your own politics, you have to simply attempt to "bash" someone elses'.

That said, I have a master's degree in public administration, and I voted for Bush twice. A lot of it has to do with conviction, determination, quality of character, and moral beliefs. Many in this country do not want to live in a world where anything goes - we want people to be accountable for their actions, and we don't feel bad telling someone that they are in the wrong.

You need to really think about what you are doing. If you really don't like Bush (or, apparently, Republicans), then you probably shouldn't ask questions that get us all rialed up.... it just makes us stronger (and more fervent).

Answer 10

Wow, another Democrat who thinks they are NEVER wrong...jeez! I did vote for Bush twice and I think given the circumstances he's doing a ok job as president, considering we are at war w/ the middle east. What was he supposed to do? "Hope" there are no WOM and let them take the USA over? I don't get it. I do think, I think that Democrats expect a hand out and are lazy. Nope, not a blind follower here!

Answer 11

Junior, we have been voting a long time. Everyone who knows anything can tell you that the American people rarely change horses in mid-stream. Unless the horse is a Horse's rearend like Jimmy Carter.

I like W. I like most of what he does. Don't particularly like how he does it.

He is my president. Conservatives are all thinkers. If you want to see blind followers just attend any protest rally anywhere and ask the liberals there a few questions. I know they will be liberals because conservatives are by nature rugged individualists and independent thinkers. Not the type to show up and shout about things they don't even understand.


.