2007-03-16 05:21:51 · 27 answers · asked by Undecided Voter 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Did you know HE wasn't talking to her?
He'd decided already that she was crazy, so he didn't want to have anything to do with her.
They don't report that much, do they?
2007-03-16 05:25:28 · answer #1 · answered by tigglys 6 · 11⤊ 4⤋
in case you don't like her, ignore about her. Flooding her website with courtroom circumstances will do no sturdy. that's going to easily inflame her more beneficial and gives you her "ammunition" for more beneficial statements and movements. it truly is, if she reads them in any respect. likely, the message may be deleted by ability of someone screening her e mail once they study the first sentence. Then all you've finished is increasing her website centred visitor count number. That makes her look more beneficial effortless than she is. the most advantageous fact that could nicely be despatched to her is that if she makes an visual charm and finally ends up conversing to an empty or almost-empty homestead. once the media figures out she has no help, they are going to ignore about her too. Our troops have fought and died for her First change rights, even if you compromise including her or no longer. a similar applies to those idiots who protest at defense force funerals. They make me angrier than Cindy Sheehan does.
2016-12-02 02:27:19 · answer #2 · answered by niesporek 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Or why has Cindy ingore Casey's grave.
Casey also reup to go back.
Casey was a hero took someone else's spot because he care about his fellow troopers.
What do we remember when we hear the name Sheehan a mother who became such a shrill voice of the left.
Her son's memory is lost.
2007-03-16 05:47:00 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
It's a horrible thing to lose a child. I haven't but I did lose a sibling, so I do have some idea what it is like. That said, Sheehan's son chose to serve his country and made the ultimate sacrifice. She chose to denigrate the country he died to protect.
2007-03-16 05:35:55 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
No. Sheehan is an idiot and an unfit parent who is profiting from her boy's death.
Her son volunteered because he loved his country and wanted to serve. It is exactly the same reason we all volunteer for the Armed Forces.
Her son died, but there is no sorrow for that on her part.
2007-03-16 05:34:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
She forgets that she gave her child up. She forgets that her son loved what he did. She forgets her son loved his country and decided he would defend it based off of the orders giving to him.
2007-03-16 06:00:55 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
i think she conveniently overlooks this fact.
i can appreciate and understand her grief, but her actions have done nothing but dishonor her son's choices as an ADULT and his ultimate sacrifice for himself and his country.
she has allowed herself to become a pawn of the far-left and is now in so deep that she can't see it.
hopefully some day she'll have an epiphany and realize how distasteful her actions have been and how they have done nothing but dishonor her son.
2007-03-16 06:27:53 · answer #7 · answered by George in Texas 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Amongst other things like does she forget that her disgraceful actions are disgracing the name of her son and making his death a mockery.
2007-03-16 05:33:20 · answer #8 · answered by Sane 6 · 6⤊ 1⤋
No. But once her son joined the military, he was subject to military orders.
Her issue is that she doesn't like the orders that were given.
Also, if I'm not mistaken, her son joined BEFORE those orders were given, so the "assumption of the risk" argument doesn't work unless her son knew those orders would be (or had been)_issued.
2007-03-16 05:24:46 · answer #9 · answered by coragryph 7 · 6⤊ 5⤋
OH my, is she still around? I didnt realize she was. Thats sad, she is pathetic, and is giving her sons time in the military over to meaningless....
2007-03-16 05:31:32 · answer #10 · answered by Bl3ss3dw1thL1f3 4 · 5⤊ 2⤋
When he joined it was right after 9/11 and he probably thought he was going to help fight the people who caused 9/11, not some dictator who had nothing to do with the taliban or osama bin ladden. The war in Iraq was thought up of by aging neo cons who wanted to invade Iraq before 9/11 and used the event to use peoples fears against them....I think she is angry that none of their sons had to die for those stupid reasons....just our sons
2007-03-16 05:27:43 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 6⤋