I just do not get this.
When the economy becomes less fettered, more people make more money.
97% of us are made better off and the other 3% are those that refuse to adapt.
Of the 97% who are better off, some move up faster than others.
Some are made rich beyond their wildest imaginations.
But this doesn't come at the expense of anyone else - the question still remains, do you want to be better off than you are today even if that means some rich guy is going to be a LOT better off, or do you want to be worse off than you are today but be consoled in the fact that the rich guy will lose his fortune?
Do we want equally shared misery or unequally shared bounty?
The Chinese are facing this issue for the first time in decades now because it's been equally shared misery for so long.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070316/ap_on_re_as/china_politics
2007-03-16
05:05:08
·
4 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Social Science
➔ Economics