Or at least get him in the debates. At least he would bring some clear thinking brain power to the discussions and help prevent the politicians from just spinning.
2007-03-16 05:02:10 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Obviously we have many people who answered, but either don't understand the man or have never actually listened to his show.
2007-03-16 05:50:16 · update #1
Spread his name around....
Like this....
Check out,,,,,Michael Savage....Live stream radio...910 KNEW.....6 PM...E.S.T.
2007-03-16 05:11:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
While Savage may be correct on so many things - the System will not let him him.
The Money Trust Cabal has a strong grip.
Get this book - The Creature from Jekyll Island.
2007-03-16 12:10:06 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
If he did decide to run he knows they woul dig up some 4th grade antic- maybe he tinkled in the bed and his mom had a one night affair with the milkaman or stole cand in jr high- all to get him ousted before the elections got into full gear.
Shock announcing doesnt appeal to me. I want to know what they can do for my country to make it even better!
2007-03-16 12:30:12 · answer #3 · answered by glorymomof3 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Do you mean "Michael Alan Weiner, Ph.D.", the conservative talk radio host (He's rated #3, behind Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity)?
And elected to what?
He has some good talking points, but then, so does Bill O'Reilly.
2007-03-16 12:28:26 · answer #4 · answered by docscholl 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
1) he is reasonably intelligent so wont run
2) he probably has a 'history' so he wont run
3) everything he has ever said on radio would be used against him; he would be torn to shreds.
4) he doesnt have enough money
5) nobody would take his sound bites as anything other than the entertainment script that they surely are.
but, yes, it would be fun for a day or 2. Him against Rush, that would be a debate to videotape!
2007-03-16 12:11:02 · answer #5 · answered by jinoturistica 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I quit listening to him recently after he made a blasphemous remark.
He attempted to compare himself to Jesus Christ.
2007-03-16 12:10:26 · answer #6 · answered by Preacher 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Mikel Sav'age? Sounds French.
But honestly, I can see why he changed his name. "The Wiener Nation" just doesn't have the same cachet.
2007-03-16 12:16:25 · answer #7 · answered by Studbolt Slickrock Deux 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
savage is an idiot who operates using the principle of shock value. take away his pulpit and ability to say outrageous things and he's got nothing. i agree with the other poster obama would wax him in a debate. to me savage is the radio version of bill o'rielly. loud mouth who speaks with volume but no substance.
2007-03-16 12:10:58 · answer #8 · answered by asg_is_chillin 4 · 1⤊ 5⤋
Give all Americans lobotomies and he may have a shot. Obama would wax the floor with Savage and his one-sided rhetoric.
2007-03-16 12:07:30 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋
didnt msnbc kick him off of his own primetime program?
2007-03-16 12:20:36 · answer #10 · answered by AlbertHoward.org 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋