Bush controlled all media until mid 2003 when the corruption became to much to cover up. With so many Americans hearing major Washington stories not being reported by major news outlets, they started wanting truth and started calling them on their hush campaign, the media finally started to cover the real news and letting us no what was really going on.
Even Rush admitted to lying and trying to keep his GOP buddies in a good light.
There are stories of corruption and manipulation on nearly an everyday basis. With one of the largest turnouts for the election of Congress and the Senate, and the call for a shift in power, isn't it obvious that America is fed up.
So my question is how can the Republican's sit there and claim that the media is on a Liberal campaign?
Republicans went on a witch hunt over a BJ.
Should Democrats be calling for their heads over what they have done?
2007-03-16 04:58:52 · 9 answers · asked by scottanthonydavis 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
its funny that people will deny what you're saying, but just the other day, haliburton, the company "formerly" run by Dick Cheney, that gave him $31 million dollars when he left to become VP of the USA, that currently has the most lucrative contracts the government has ever given anyone (and didnt even let any other companies vie for those contracts, and now haliburton has lost tons of american dollars that are supposed to be helping secure our boys in Iraq, but nobody seems to be accountable) moved to DUBAI, (esentially moving to Saudi Arabia), and it was on the internet news sites for about half an hour, then disappeared entirely. wasnt in the Boston Globe, wasnt on the evening news, nothing....
i'm not a conspiracy kinda guy, but c'mon.... news that big doesnt just go unnoticed. i really wish i was home now to watch Valerie Plame testify, and i hope that somehow, someway, in the next election, things will really change. dont get me wrong, BOTH sides of the coin are up to their ears in BS, and there's crooked people on both sides... .but man, right now the republicans are just the worst... its good that some of their own kind are finally getting sick of the crap the white house has pulled in the last 6 years.
cheney, rove, bush, rice, tony snow, and everyone else involved should be in prison.
2007-03-16 05:12:54 · answer #1 · answered by hellion210 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
it fairly is a factor of the whole communicate radio mentality. in case you repeat some thing long sufficient and loud sufficient, the plenty will have self assurance it. the fact is that as quickly as polled maximum newshounds are extra liberal than the final inhabitants, whether, the vendors of the media are plenty extra conservative than the final inhabitants. that's the vendors that make the possibilities on how liberal or conservative the information reporting is. Why do you think of that the information media as an entire has desperate that the yank human beings shouldn't see the caskets coming back from Iraq? BTW, Hannity is an abomination to absolutely everyone with an IQ over 70. Explains why Bush loves him.
2016-10-01 00:34:21 · answer #2 · answered by elzey 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ok Ya there, and the Democrats are upstanding I am 100% honest.
All politicians should be rounded up and shipped out to the moon.
Definition politics - Organized supreme power
Definition Politician - Seeker of Supreme power
That's it nothing more. If you ride on their cart you better have the reigns
2007-03-16 05:04:53 · answer #3 · answered by Uncle Red 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is a great question. After so many lies, even the media has to tell the truth.
2007-03-16 05:13:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because TRUTH in the LIBERAL media is lacking...just like the slant you put on your question is lacks fairness...Now then again if it Bashed GW you think it is fair...BET ( even though he ADMITTED IT WAS A FRAUD) you think the false reports Dan Rather gave were fair..right at election...
PS it was not the BJ Clinton got...it was the PERJURY he committed about it...if you or I did that we would be in jail...He lied under oath in a law suit to save his own butt...yes even if it was over a BJ
2007-03-16 05:25:52 · answer #5 · answered by Real Estate Para Legal 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Is it "real" news because its bashing Bush?? If the media was ripping into liberals, would it be "real news" then, or would you have an excuse for that too??
EVERYONE knows that the media is against Bush.....not a good question.
2007-03-16 05:02:27 · answer #6 · answered by panthrchic 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Bush controlled all media until 2003????
So, he wrote all those columns that were FOS and that it said were written by Krugman?
And he sent Dan Rather those documents?
2007-03-16 05:07:39 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
When the free press says things that conflict with your party's propaganda of course you call their stories propaganda.
2007-03-16 05:06:41 · answer #8 · answered by Alan S 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
They don't. Everything after "call" in your opening sentence is factually incorrect.
2007-03-16 05:03:09 · answer #9 · answered by VoodooPunk 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋