So you think her animal rights campaign is a publicity thing for her or ......................
And who's side are you on, hers or Paul's?
2007-03-16 04:26:59 · 33 answers · asked by fancypants 4 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
She was on the TV last night and she was being interviewed and there was a leather sofa and she got them to cover it with a blanket before she sat on it because she didn't want to be seen sitting on leather but then she sat on it with the blanket on it!!!!!! To me that was publicity because she sat on it anyway
2007-03-16 04:54:47 · update #1
She's been doing the animal rights thing for years, long before she met Paul McCartney so I wouldn't think it's for publicity. Not on anyone's side, couldn't really care less, although both of them irritate me.
2007-03-16 04:32:10 · answer #1 · answered by flyingconfused 5 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Actually, because she is going on "Dancing with the Stars," I think she is trying to get "symapthy", or just looking for the "spotlight".
I hate that when someone marries into "celebrity", (I never heard of her before she went with him), gets known and gets attention, and then has the gall to say "she didn't need anything he had and was doing good on her own.
I am sure she would have never been "known" if she would never have got hitched to him.
He was probably lonely when he met her, couldn't see through her, and was naively sucked into marrying her, (and I am sure she used her leg accident as a weapon), and now she is trying to act like some poor victim.
2007-03-16 04:39:35 · answer #2 · answered by pixles 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Shes a gold digger definitely on Paul's side he had true love with Linda and the poor man thought he could have it a 2nd time around and got hurt at a pretty ripe ol age! I think she genuinely cares about the causes she is involved with because this was what Paul was probably initially attracted to about hr in the first place.
2007-03-16 04:38:06 · answer #3 · answered by kiss 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Heather mills were always a bad idea. How on earth was anyone ever going to power a mill with heather? Windmills, now they're good, and water mills were good in their day. But heather mills? Rubbish.
2007-03-16 04:38:59 · answer #4 · answered by Bacon 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It's hard not to dislike her due to the representation of her given by the media being so bad. Whether the animal rights stuff is for publicity or not, it's not getting her good publicity. But of course 'no publicity is bad publicity.' Either way it gets the cause into the papers etc.. I can't really take a side as I don't know the full story. But some of what she has accused him of is horrendous if true.
2007-03-16 04:32:59 · answer #5 · answered by Corsair//Dread 2 · 0⤊ 4⤋
I don't know her personally and her relationship issues are a private affair.
I believe that all divorces should be completed fairly and I hope that she gets an equitable settlement. I guess she may now be settling into a future working lifestyle, so I can't blame her for that, as I know she has at least 1 child to support.
Remember, our media does not give unbiased reporting, so I am always wary of loving or loathing a media created fantasy image of someone. Like gossip really, which I don't trust either.
Good luck! Rob
2007-03-16 04:43:01 · answer #6 · answered by Rob E 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
to think one side or the other is tabloid rubbish. Heather Mills is one of those people who pretends to be something that she is not, which is a feeling, human being. She obviously craves attention and is greedy. She is another shallow person in the media that people can worship and identify with in their own shallow way.
2007-03-16 04:35:27 · answer #7 · answered by Tom W 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Ever since this whole thing with Macca ive had nothing but disrespect for this stupid cow! this animal rights thing is to keep her in the eye now shes not hanging of the arm of a legend!
2007-03-16 04:37:00 · answer #8 · answered by Jemmax 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
shes a tart
shes a tart who manipulates the media when it suits her, and cries - boo hoo - when the media comes back and bites her shiny metal ***.
she manipulated Paul McCartney who was a RICH grieving widower.
I am a dedicated meat eater...I could give a monkeys about her animals rights campaign, in fact next time I'm in M&S, I'm going to go to their food hall and buy a BLT, just out of spite
2007-03-16 04:38:53 · answer #9 · answered by SeabourneFerriesLtd 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
GOLD DIGGER! but I guess we all knew that anyway.
I wish Macca lots of peace and happiness now he's ditched the WITCH oh hang on thats an insult to witches.
Peace
2007-03-16 04:40:43 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋