My argument is that employers benefit from a surplus of labor. Rather than bringing women's wages up to the level of men, feminism was successful in bringing men's wages down. It is Econ101...supply and demand. The demand for labor is the same, but the supply is much higher, so the wages go down. If women would focus on family and actually having marriageable skills, they might find that it's easier to find that dreamboat with the six figure income. I'm all for equal rights, but equal roles???
2007-03-16
04:20:10
·
5 answers
·
asked by
mikehunt29
5
in
Social Science
➔ Economics
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/marriageable
mar·riage·a·ble /ˈmærɪdʒəbəl/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[mar-i-juh-buhl] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–adjective 1. suitable or attractive for marriage: The handsome and successful young man was considered eminently marriageable.
2. of an age suitable for marriage: a marriageable daughter.
2007-03-16
04:54:14 ·
update #1
Most of your responses are based on emotion, not logic. That's pretty much what I expected. The reason I'm asking is that many women I know (unmarried in their 30s and really want to be married) are more focused on their careers than on their personal life. They don't have the desirable skills that men find attractive. Instead, they are trying to attract men the way men attract women- stability and security. I once had a girlfriend that tried to 'sell herself' to me saying that she had a good job. Most men don't care what a woman's job is the way a woman cares about a man's. I saw this on an episode of Seinfeld last night and thought I'd ask the question here today. FYI, my wife stays home with 'the brats' and I wish I could spend as much time with them as she does, but that is not my role.
2007-03-16
05:02:52 ·
update #2