English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The Scientists in this documentary don't. Hell, a lot of the scientists on the Global Warming "list" don't either...they were just put there.

2007-03-16 04:01:48 · 14 answers · asked by Q-burt 5 in Politics & Government Politics

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4520665474899458831&hl=en

2007-03-16 04:01:55 · update #1

anthonyinkc -

Oooohh...it's a typo...should I go back through your posts and bring up typo's and gramar errors?

Get a life hero

2007-03-16 05:30:48 · update #2

14 answers

The real inconvenient truth here is that mother nature is one of the biggest polluters on the planet. One volcano eruption puts out more CO2 than all of the factories on the planet.

The global warming crowd is an environmentalist cash grab. Look at Al Gore. He owns an environmental company and he pays his carbon credits to this company. So basically he is taking money from his right pocket and putting it into his left and no one is questioning him about it.

This is no different than what a business owner does when they purchase a building. They set up a leasing company that owns the property and the company pays rent to the leasing company. So the business owner is taking money from the right hand and putting it in the left hand.

Follow the cash people. Greenpeace and other environmental groups are looking to the carbon credits to fund them as they fight the pollution battle.

Global warming is a natural occurrence that has happened since the beginning of time.

2007-03-16 04:32:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

some climate replace skeptics dispute the so-called ‘greenhouse outcome’, which keeps the outdoors temperature of the Earth about 30 levels C hotter than it might want to be if there have been no greenhouse gases in the ambience. In different words, without the greenhouse outcome, the Earth may be frequently uninhabitable. How do all of us know for particular this outcome is real? the most is verified by undemanding physics, because a bare rock orbiting the solar on the gap of the Earth should be a procedures chillier than the Earth easily is. the reason of this statement replaced into depending on the artwork of John Tyndall, who got here across in 1859 that a number of gases, including carbon dioxide and water vapour, might want to capture warmth. This replaced into the first information for what all of us know now as greenhouse gases. Then, in the route of the accurate of a similar century, a Swedish scientist named Svante Arrhenius proved the relationship between greenhouse gas concentrations and floor temperatures. We in undemanding words ought to look to our moon for information of what the Earth may be like without an surroundings that sustained the greenhouse outcome. at the same time as the moon’s floor reaches one hundred thirty levels C in direct photograph voltaic on the equator (266 levels F), at the same time as the solar ‘is going down’ on the moon, the temperature drops exceedingly a lot in the present day, and plunges in distinct hours all the way down to minus one hundred and ten levels C (-166F).

2016-12-02 02:22:32 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The problem with anthony's answer is that it pretends that if we don't do what the global warming crowd says to do about CO2, we're not doing anything at all, and that's just not accurate. We ARE limiting proven pollutants and the GOP has been at the forefront of that - - Richard Nixon created the EPA!!!!

2007-03-16 04:13:22 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Global warming is a theory at this point.

Everyone should plant a tree to help reduce the CO2

2007-03-16 04:07:13 · answer #4 · answered by az 4 · 4 1

This is like the credits Al Gore has. I know the earth is warming, and there is plenty of proof. But I believe the man made story is bunk. I'm glad these scientist have confirmed my beliefs.

2007-03-16 04:15:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Many Politicians and Scientists on the Man made Global warming 'side' have been quoted as saying its okay to lie or exaggerate to win their cause. WHICH MEANS they believe in it so much they don't care if they are wrong.
THAT is not science. That is religion.

Lets spend our money on things we definitly can fix without bankrupting our GRANDCHILDREN!

2007-03-16 04:09:13 · answer #6 · answered by kent j 3 · 5 2

Most sceintists also know how to spell the word "exists" properly too.

Global Warming is a theory, but the facts are real concerning excess co2.

Sooner or later, all the pollution in the atmosphere will catch up with society.

2007-03-16 04:04:40 · answer #7 · answered by Villain 6 · 5 4

Doesn't take a genius to know the planet is warming up when 10,000 yers ago it was covered in ice.

It is a natural occurance, not a "man made" problem

2007-03-16 04:07:03 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 6 2

Yes many people say that, however it is simply untrue. Consider who is out there trying to convince us of this, Al Gore and a bunch of ignorant liberals, I do not believe that our climate is heating up, God is in control of our climate ,,he created our climate,he controls our climate,Al Gore and the likes need to get a life. Get a job,doing something purposeful,stop wasting our money on Climate when there is not one single thing that he or any human being on this earth can do about our Climate.
Where do these little narrow minded,people come from. Have they never read the book on climates. the BIBLE? whats next. This is like the idiots that gripe about cutting down trees,and gun control. God gave us those trees to build our homes,to protect our family,but if we did not have the little Joan Fondas and enviormentalist ,we wouldnt have anything to write about in this forum. if you want to know anything about our climate check in with the one who created it.

2007-03-16 04:12:13 · answer #9 · answered by doverslight61 2 · 2 4

Jerry Falwell says it's a tool of Satan but he's an idiot. Lesson: Consider the source before you site someone stupid and who has no credibility.

2007-03-16 04:29:00 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers