His information sounds legitimate, states documentation, sources, evidence, but the things he brings out about the government sounds warped, and improbable. How can you decern? Really don't want it to be true.How can all the evidence he has be proven false, and the people backing him be discredited, or can they? Should we all pay more attention?
2007-03-16 03:54:18 · 4 answers · asked by Linda L 3 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
You should not take Alex’s commentary as gospel nor should you take the “official story as gospel.
Free speech serves little purpose unless you use it with an open mind, otherwise all you wind up doing is cheer leading.
Those that hold that the Administration has a clean slate have been given vastly more coverage by Mass Media than those who have doubts concerning the Administrations official story.
I submit that before anybody goes off to far in any direction in promoting either side of the issue they should at the very least hear and understand the questions being asked .
Please refer to the link listed below for a comprehensive list of anomalies that the 9/11 commission report failed to address.
http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20050523112738404
Most of these omissions have a legitimate explanation, a few of them however may very well not have legitimate explanations in which case some measure of reasonable Justice should be served if we are to maintain a free society.
2007-03-16 06:00:44 · answer #1 · answered by Daniel O 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He uses 2 very old techniques. Partial information. He picks over the facts, selects those that support his case and ignores those that don't. This includes taking statements apart and quoting small sections out of context. His other one is the false expert. He gets someone with a professional accreditation and uses their pronouncements as gospel truth. However, their accreditations have no relevance to the subject in hand. There have been cases of using 'facts' from someone who did have relevant accreditations, but it turned out it was someone with the same name who knew nothing about the topic and not the claimed expert.
I won't say his work s shoddy, it is not. It is very elaborate but just a fabrication. It takes a lot of effort to produce such an elaborate tissue of lies.
2007-03-16 11:07:24 · answer #2 · answered by Elizabeth Howard 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Who does he work for? Knowing that, you should know the answer. It is safe to assume they are "misstatements".
2007-03-16 11:18:41 · answer #3 · answered by John S 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes we should all pay close attention.
2007-03-16 23:14:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋