"Is Nandhigram Mamata,s political stunt to build up her vote bank?"?

Question

As Mamata encouraging the innocent farmers against present Government.
If she decide for state industrial development then where she will do it, in UP or Bihar?

Answer 1

W.Bengal is starting a new wave of industrialisation after a long time.
Mamata is always doing such type of unjustified movements.
She is a short tempered leader and always wants high publicity.
This is only a stunt.

Answer 2

Subject to Nandigram, Mamata Banerjee is being try to build up a public, farmers agitation aganist the Bengal's C.M.'s
dectearship on destraction of farmer's pady land issue, whether, the Nandigram's farmers are not not interested at all.
In Singur, Mrs. Mamata Banerjee's also still fighting on behalf
of farmers, whose are loosing thir agri -land. So many, political parties supporting hirself. This is not political stant.
All West Bengal's public supporting herself, She is not corrupted leader.She is Trinamul congress leader.Ultimately,
her carrier is going to build up a greater vote bank,But, now, it is not clear.Bengal's peoples are understanding the communist parties charrecter.In 33 yrars the leftists parties
are not doing sufficient development in Bengal.
Now, we do need a change in Bengal in replease of Leftiests
parties. If, Mamata Banerjee of Bengal, can be able to build up her vote bank inBengal, then, it will be better to Bengal.
As an NDA member, she may go any wher in India for industrial growth not only, in Bihar or UP. thats all.
.

Answer 3

apart from whether mamta banerjee is corrupt or not, i think wat really matters is how the farmers are going to be suported, no amount of financial aid can help them, theyll use it to pay off their debts, we need to give them the fishing rod and not the fish. the land taht the salim industries want to aquire is very fertile land, it is situated on the delta, developing a chemical factory on taht alnd is not only taking away a farmers basic right but is also going to harm the environment. farmers should eitehr be helped in relocating themselves to simialrly fertile lands, or else the factory be given some other place, sez's shud compromise now. the union budget is also a supporter for the richer industrialist, the divide btw the poor and the rich is continuing to widen.
vot bank politics have become such a regular feature, it's almost trivil to discuss, we know its there, n we know we cant trust any of the ministers, kissa kursi ka..dats all der is left to the indian poltico scene. sad but true.

Answer 4

I don't know where you come from. But by posting such a question, you most certainly come across as ignorant or insensitive. Wiser heads than you like H.E. The Governor of W.B., intellectuals, scientists, students, in short people from every walk of life in the state have been shocked beyond belief at such brutal mass murder and violation of basic fundamental rights. Nobody has questioned Mamata's motives or her involvement in this matter. Such thoughts can come to the crassest minds or to the minds of criminals or those who possibly hail from the uncivilised backyards of Bihar. Shame on you.

Answer 5

yes it is a political stunt to be in the limelight. Nowdays STRIKE is use as weapon by the political parties to misguide the people, but in past days it was used to solve the problem or was used to make an amicable settlement. In present scenario instead of seeing the wellfare of the people , this political leaders only seek a chance to counter attack there rival political leaders so they can get chance to come back in the power. By opposing to industrialisation mamta is stoping the growth of the state , if she really care's why is she opposing to it .Due to industrial growth youth of the state will get the employment , state will progress see nation like CHINA they have strong industrial base. If she wants state to progress she should stop such kinds of protest , because a single STRIKE causes loss of crore's rupees & also due to such kind of protest or strike big companies hesitate to invest in the state .SO for the wellfare & betterment of the state such kind of political activities should not be done by our political leaders

Answer 6

Leave aside Mamta Banerji. The chief Minister of west Bengal and his comrades believe that the poor compensation to be paid by the government for land acquisition is enough or the families for their life time .The CM is not talking about any rehabilitation of displaced farmers. They have proved that communists are worse than Jamindars of the past. Its only now that people of west Bengal have begun to realise this

Answer 7

i dont think so .coz most of the people involved in the protests are from the ruling party . if u r talking about industrial development , y should u blindly follow china or else . y dont u think of alternate ideas ? SEZs are not the only answers for industrial development . try to carefully analyse the parts in the budjet related to these SEZs . u will understand the disadvantages related to them .

Answer 8

How about in Agra? Just next to the Taj Mahal!???
Oops! I guess i did'nt get the question... hrrmmm excuse me gotta go.... ;)

Answer 9

YES