No, that would not work. A black hole is not a thing that you can destroy with energy. It is a warp of space into a place from which no information can come. It would suck up an entire galaxy, if you were to throw one into it. The only change in the black hole would be its getting bigger.
2007-03-16 06:29:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No.
Once the hydrogen passes the event horizon, it ceases to be a part of our physical universe. The event horizon is the location around the black hole's center of mass where the force of gravity exceeds any possible accelleration (the speed of light).
However, the statement "nothing escapes a black hole" is believed to be incorrect. Black holes were once believed to be 'hairless' but that is no longer the case.
Current theory states that at the event horizon, particle - antiparticle pairs are being created constantly, with one escaping and one being drawn below the event horison.
Eventually, tho, it is believed that black holes do stop spinning and become hairless after all.
You might want to pick up a copy of "From the Big Bang to Black Holes", an excellent text on the universe written for the layman.
2007-03-16 05:35:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by edward_otto@sbcglobal.net 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The hydrogen explosions that power the sun wouldn't occur in a Black Hole simply because there are no "ex"-plosions, only "im"-plosions due to the intense gravitational field. In fact, electrons, protons and neutrons all just collapse into a singularity - a point of virtually no volume.
A star like our sun, however, shines from the power of hydrogen fusion radiating outward (escaping the sun's gravity) into space.
2007-03-16 23:54:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by Stewart 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
some thing the place each and every of the guidelines of physics are ineffective a million.A black hollow is defined to be a area of area-time the place get away to the outdoors universe is impossible. The outer boundary of this area is noted as the form horizon. no longer something can circulate from interior the form horizon to the outdoors, even quickly, using severe gravitational container latest interior the area. for a similar reason, observers outdoors the form horizon won't be able to see any events which could be occurring interior the form horizon; subsequently any capability being radiated or events occurring interior the area are constantly no longer able to be seen or detected from outdoors. interior the black hollow is a singularity, an anomalous place the place count number is compressed to the degree that the favourite rules of physics no longer keep on with to it. Black hollow could be defined as a area in area with a gravitational container so powerfful that even electromagnetic radiations (even gentle) won't have the ability to flee from it. it is of any length an d its mass could be between that of sunlight to many million cases the mass of sunlight.... Chandrasekhara shrink : This shrink describes the optimum mass of a white dwarf massive call or equivalently the minimum mass for which a large call will finally fall down right into a neutron massive call or black hollow after a supernova explosion.
2016-10-18 12:46:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by rosen 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
A Black hole isnt really a hole. Its an explanation for a phenomina where rthe gravity is so strong that nothing, not even light, can escape it. People dont know what it looks like, sounds like or anything. It could be pure gravity, or it could be super compressed matter with high gravity. If you fed it hydrogen it might explode under the pressure, and turn into helium, like the sun, maybe. I dont think so though, even if it did, you wouldent see it, cos once dsomething goes it, it aint' comming out ever again.
2007-03-16 02:48:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by Josh 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
No.... a black hole is a remnant of a star that exploded; the left over core would simply suck in the hydrogen (and any other material) and add it to it's own mass.
2007-03-16 04:41:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by quantumclaustrophobe 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, but if you want to compel it to expand, adding charged particles might be interesting. Charge is always conserved, even in a black hole, and I'd've thought there must come a point when the charge density became too great for the graivty field to contain it.
2007-03-16 03:15:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by Ian I 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Adding energy in any form to a Black Hole simply makes it bigger. There is no way to destroy a Black Hole aside from letting it slowly (very slowly!) evaporate due to Hawking radiation.
2007-03-16 02:47:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by cosmo 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, because it is already a collapsed star that absorbs everything.
2007-03-16 02:48:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by Ted 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
no
2007-03-16 18:08:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by its_whatever11 3
·
0⤊
0⤋