It is no different than any other out patient operation that crushes the skull, cuts off the arms, sucks out the pieces of the fetuses body, and runs the risk of causing a woman to get septic shock from rotting body parts inside of her.
Why are the NEOCON Nazi's so worried about the supposed 'life' of a fetus but won't support a woman's right to privately have an abortion?
2007-03-16 02:26:40 · 19 answers · asked by Indy Plume 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
graphic, I never considered myself a nazi, just a proponent of personal responsibility.
2007-03-16 02:30:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
"It is no different than any other out patient operation that crushes the skull, cuts off the arms, sucks out the pieces of the fetuses body, and runs the risk of causing a woman to get septic shock from rotting body parts inside of her." -- What other surgery is it that does this as well?
So you are talking about partial birth abortion when the fetus is 3rd trimester and considered a living creature. So now why is it that the leftist "Demoncrats" are for PETA and lives of animals, but not of human children? You would rather save a whale and harpoon an infant.
So I guess you should actually call the demoncrats the Nazi's, after all abortion could be considered race extermination. Are abortion clinics medical institutions or Nazi death camps? Then again it is only those on the right who are "bad".
2007-03-16 02:43:22 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Taking an unborn's life just because its convenient for the mother because the baby might get in the way of her career prospects is in my mind a clear case of immorality . Its a clear example of the twisted and perverse beliefs of certain liberals who support selfish supposed rights which override responsibility and new life itself. What a sad juvenile remark "Neocon Nazi's" a classic example of pointless liberal name calling for your information the Nazis supported Eugenics the forced abortions of the " undesirables" Mentally Handicapped etc. The best way for a woman to avoid having a baby is celibacy in marriage but liberals will call that being to judgmental instead they promote promiscuity and pills and rubber and taking the life of the unborn if its inconvenient.
2007-03-16 02:46:59 · answer #3 · answered by jack lewis 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because they are fundamentalists... as some muslims state that a rapped woman is to punish because she was leaving home and get to danger by this so the NEOCONS state that only God can decide about life...
the tragic thing is that the neocons don´t wanna spend money on orphan homes, but they still wnna forbid abortion...
there are reasons for abortion and the only person that has the right to decide is the woman...
but what do you expect of people who think this is God´s own country and not a place given to make a better place to live out of it...
2007-03-16 02:36:04 · answer #4 · answered by Steini - 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Two Things:
1.) Killing a child via something called "abortion" or an "outpatient procedure" is still killing them.
2.) A women's right to choose is truely that thier right. However, it is all of our right to inform her about what she is doing and help her to choose not to do it. With all the information how could you choose to kill someone?
I often find people that are pro-life and pro-choice. That is the agree with a women's right to choose but would never have an abortion. This is not a contridiction. They choose life above all else but they also choose to not judge. In the end abortion is something that a woman chooses to comit to a living defensless being and that choice will be judged utlimately by God.
2007-03-16 02:43:49 · answer #5 · answered by a_talis_man 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
For people who choose to believe in God it is unthinkable that something should be done only because it is convienent and more cost effective. Is child slave labor considered a good choice for large companies because it is convient and more cost effective for them to do this? Most Christians are not control freaks, but people who are deeply concerned about the welfare of others and what God thinks about the current situtation given the fact that we shall all stand before Him for our actions and give an account Christians and non-believers alike. If abortion should be legal on the sole grounds that the mother hasn't the resources to take care of the child or the pregnancy is the result of rape or incest, why isn't the mother willing to part with the child to a loving stable family that does have the resources? Why is it better to kill the baby then to allow it to live with another family that will choose to love it? I understand that the screening process for adoptive families is pretty strict (it cost $16,000 in the state of Wisconsin) with contuing oversight by the state. When a Christian couple approaches a women entering an abortion clinic pleading that they will take care of ALL child rearing expenses why does she still choose the abortion? Christians are not a perverted, amoral, relativist people. We live in deep gratitude of the tremendous sacrafice that Christ gave on our behalf (see Passion of the Christ by Mel Gibson)! I still have not heard one good line of reasoning that it is better to kill then to give the baby a chance to have a good life. If the pro-choice option be championed in the name of freedom why not give the baby the freedom choice to live?
2007-03-16 03:04:04 · answer #6 · answered by vantil23 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Before spouting off crap about right wingers wanting to control how others live answer me this: what gives our courts the right to prevent or prosocute a person for killing people they don't want around. Why is there law against the murder of adults who can defend themselves but not one against the murder of a fetus who can't. It is still the taking of a life.
2007-03-16 02:39:31 · answer #7 · answered by joevette 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You don't mind killing a baby?
I support the fact that the government has no business telling a woman what procedure she can or cannot have.
I am against abortion due to the fact that it is a child that you're killing.
2007-03-16 02:34:57 · answer #8 · answered by ? 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Your question answers itself. As to neocon Nazis fascism always comes from the left
2007-03-16 02:39:00 · answer #9 · answered by espreses@sbcglobal.net 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Abortion is muder performed by doctors. Many of these 'fetuses' that they label as not viable, are aborted crying.
They let them lie there until they die. Doctors are muderous human beings.
2007-03-16 02:58:29 · answer #10 · answered by Lou 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
abortion is just straight up wrong. that is the stupidest question that i have ever read. how could you ask that at all?????? how would you have felt if ur mom had told you that she thought of aborting you? you would not be here today to be asking that dumb question. i could go on and on about that horrible question, but i have other questions to answer that actually need my attention and input. next time think before you ask.
2007-03-16 02:32:55 · answer #11 · answered by jenrulz13 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋