English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

20 answers

No, it would still be a work of art AND very stale by now.

(by the way, Donatello's David is a bronze and was created a few years BEFORE Michaelangelo's marble. You can see them both in Florence)

2007-03-16 02:18:04 · answer #1 · answered by cate 4 · 0 0

Yes

2007-03-16 02:17:35 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

firstly it's the wrong ninja teenage mutant turtle, it's suposed to be done by michaelangelo .and secondly it was done sooooooooo long ago that it would have turned bad long ago(if it had survived)
so.... even if it was premium dark chocolate, i wouldn't eat it.
God bless,
gabe

2007-03-17 05:03:09 · answer #3 · answered by gabegm1 4 · 0 0

donatello didnt sculpt david?

2007-03-16 04:02:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I eat the ears and tail my kids' Easter Bunny every year.


In retaliation, they always eat a big portion of my birthday cake.

2007-03-16 01:49:22 · answer #5 · answered by Benvenuto 7 · 0 2

No

Cause it was Michelangelo who did the statue of David.

2007-03-16 01:54:16 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

If it was the 70% stuff then I'd eat a bit (or two)

2007-03-16 01:49:49 · answer #7 · answered by angelina.rose 4 · 0 1

If it was of dark chocolate yes, but not all at once, obvious

2007-03-16 01:48:25 · answer #8 · answered by emi79 3 · 1 1

if it was high quality chocolate

then i'd start with the penis take a picture and put it on myspace

2007-03-16 01:58:47 · answer #9 · answered by Twinkie 2 · 0 1

Anything in chocolate is eatable

2007-03-16 01:50:49 · answer #10 · answered by aotea s 5 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers