Yes indeed. Though the Indian foreign policy has inclined favourably towards the US in the recent past, the US does not view India as a 'strategic ally' (like Japan, S. Korea, UK and Australia). Therefore with its own interests at stake, the US conveniently vetoed Tharoor's nomination. With Ban Ki Moon, a South Korean at the helm, the US will be able to leverage major decisions in its favour.
2007-03-16 01:32:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
yes shashi tharoor represents the 100 crore population of india. so he must not be a slave to the big countries and it make the country prestage go down. so if the othr ppl want to be a follower as a leader then its best to go down
2007-03-16 07:54:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by chandra v 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
one,Of course, US always doesn't view INDIA to be a good ally.
this is becoz. india never readily accepts war and harsh policies and follows NON-ALIGNMENT.this is why we are not a permanent member in UN SECURITY COUNCIL.
two,north korea's nuke prog. is of great concern for US.
by making a south korean as sec.gen.it will put more PRESSURE.
also ban-ki-moon will prove to be a puppet if US decides to fight iran.
2007-03-16 07:52:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by ♠ Author♠ 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
he is not confident enough to garner enough votes to win the election.
2007-03-16 19:10:39
·
answer #4
·
answered by Sree 1
·
1⤊
0⤋