i reckon the money could have been better spent elsewhere - like u say, hospitals, schools, police, public service in general! I think that its typical of our Governemnt - their priorities are all wrong. The money thats is allocated for such sports events and for the renewal of our nuclear arms programme could go a long way in helping to address the social issues faced in our society. but will the Government listen? no. Forget our social issues, forget our youth. Roll on the glory that the Olymics will bring to the UK.
2007-03-15 23:59:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
If you think that the cost of either will stay at £9bn then you are rather naive. the unnecessary Olympics will cost at least £20bm and the new Trident will cost the same. We only need Trident to defend our selves against the Americans who do not invade any country where there are Nuclear weapons, but the Olympics are a complete waste of our money, especially when we are told that there is no money for Pensions, Schools, Hospitals, Roads, Railways etc.
2007-03-16 06:08:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Forget Trident which is a waste of 25 billion, diplomacy costs nothing. Use diplomacy more. The Foreign ministries of each nation should do their bit. Monies can be utilised better, i.e. hospitals, dentists, doctors and less red tape
Olympics, different matters, it will bring more monies into a poor area. Regeneration of the area will bring better housing and facilities in the long term for the area. Feel sorry for Ken livingstone, who is fighting a losing battle to keep costs down for Londoners, a bit like Millenium Dome. ,
2007-03-15 23:50:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by brogdenuk 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
A lot of money could have been spent on matters that seem more urgent to us now. A lot of the proposed budget is actually re-generating run-down areas of London so in that espect the money is been put to good news. The spectacle of hosting the Olympics (the biggest show on earth) could be worth billions in revenue when the games take place so it's swings and round-abouts.
I'm glad we've got the games for one and will be travelling down from Yorkshire to watch as much action as I can!!
2007-03-15 23:52:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by Smarty 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Trident is essential for our defence. Some idiots wearing lycra and throwing sticks we can heartily do without. Keep Trident, give the Olympics to some other country, anywhere.
2007-03-16 05:58:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by selkent 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
The Olympics will never present good value - but that doesn't matter - it is too important an opportunity to miss! I am looking forward to going to it already.
If it costs £10 billion we'll be doing well - realistically the final bill will be nearer £20 billion.
2007-03-15 23:54:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by LongJohns 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
We could only dream that a government will actually put some serious money into the public services. If people actually stopped being so diplomatic and show in blood how much our government has hurt us, then something might be done.
2007-03-16 03:52:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by the_defiler_behemoth 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
The EU will move the 2012 games to Paris and say it is London.
2007-03-16 00:26:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by ThorGirl 4
·
0⤊
2⤋