2007-03-15 20:21:28 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Wherever the polls are at any particular time.
2007-03-16 01:52:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Monotone. She has been practicing the monotone. It makes her sound sooo intelligent.
The cadence of her speech is like a drum with nearly dead batteries. V e r y s t e a d y.
Her use of dumb jokes and poor black accents is a stroke of genius.
She is also learning to get behind larger lecterns, so her thighs look normal.
She has increased the lighting from above, so her bags beneath the eyes look almost healthy.
Lastly, her wig looks quite real. The caps are a success. She needs sex...as the vibrator is making her numb.
I can honestly say, 8 years of her voice will mesmerize America. She is a most fascinating dolt, and has a loyal husband...who loves her as few men cherish their wives.
I figure she'll win, but only if Bush gets us into Iran, North Korea and in a huge fight with China, over Taiwan.
She has stopped killing people around her, and so, I may vote for her, if all the other liars drop out of the race.
.
2007-03-16 03:23:45 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Probably the same as it was today.... nothing has changed.
Ending the war has never precluded keeping some forces present in an advisory or educational role. In fact, isn't that what major supportors of continued Iraq deployment keep arguing -- that the situation is similar to Germany, Korea and Vietnam where the US kept forces there for decades after the war?
But so far, I haven't seen here say anything in the past two years that contradicts her current stance that military combat operations are counter-productive and should be stopped.
2007-03-16 03:27:21 · answer #3 · answered by coragryph 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Hillary never did "vote for the war." What she voted for was a resolution to authorize Bush to threaten to use force to get Saddam Hussein to cooperate with the UN arms inspectors. Everyone is forgetting that at the time, Bush was pushing the lie that he wouldn't take the country to war, he just wanted a threat to bluff with. Hillary is now, has always been, and will always be against unilateral aggressive war such as our invasion of Iraq.
2007-03-16 03:34:10 · answer #4 · answered by RE 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Depends on where she's at. If its Boston, she will be dumping tea and immitating a rather bad Boston accent.
2007-03-16 03:30:53 · answer #5 · answered by George 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I think she's scheduled to be for the war through Sunday.
2007-03-16 03:26:55 · answer #6 · answered by DOOM 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Which way will the wind shift?
2007-03-16 07:06:13 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋