i think man utd are pretty limited with larsson on his way back home if anything happens to rooney we would stuggle with ageing solsjkaer, injury prone alan smith and saha who has only score one in 12 game and also has been side lined recently,
chealsea aswell if drogba gets injured there in trouble, i think arsenal have the best with henry, adebayoer baptista, van persie, walcott and aliadiere, i like liverpool's strike force but they are missing a world class striker. spurs are well of with berbatov, mido, keane and defoe.
Spurs fans any news on young dixon has he recovered from injury, any chance on him breaking into the first team?
2007-03-15 18:31:24 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football ➔ English Football
Even though i am a Man u fan i think the MAn u strike force was the best last season
But this season it has been good but it is very fragile now
Tottenham have the best strike force in the EPL they have 4 damn good strikers in the form of Mido, defoe, keane and berbatov
2007-03-16 01:28:19 · answer #1 · answered by Nightcrawler 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
call this formation 4-2-3-a million objective - Cech Left lower back - Zambrotta Centre lower back - Terry Centre lower back - Nesta surprising lower back - Alves shielding Mid - Gattuso critical Mid - Scholes surprising mid - Cristiano Ronaldo Offensive mid - Kaka Left Mid - Ronaldinho Striker - Drogba Subs - a million- Buffon 2- Gallas 3- Puyol 4- Gerrard 5- Messi 6- Eto'o i think of this part has a large stability, the aptitude of Ronaldo, Kaka and Ronaldinho, with the capability and ability of Drogba up front. Scholes sitting interior the middle appearing as a playmaker and Gattuso the ball winner in the back of.
2016-10-18 12:25:42 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Chelsea has Drogba and only. Liverpool has Kuyt (he is cool!!!), Bellamy and crouch are sometimes play good and sometimes they play bad. arsenal has Henry and van persie . man utd has Rooney and saha( they are like Bellamy and crouch ). SO I THINK ARSENAL HAS BEST STRIKERS!!!!!!!!!
2007-03-15 23:44:55 · answer #3 · answered by dragontm 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Arsenal when Henry and Van Persie are both fit.
2007-03-16 18:39:14 · answer #4 · answered by kwilfort 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes, spurs have a good attacking line, however Arsenal too have a good one in Henry, van persie, and Adebayor, so also in young Walcott
2007-03-16 03:36:59 · answer #5 · answered by vio_prince 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A team that doesn't come to mind that often when this question is asked is Liverpool. They have some solid strikers in Crouch and Bellamy but they are not always consistent.
2007-03-15 18:47:58 · answer #6 · answered by BenficaFan1 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Chelsea.
2007-03-16 04:20:14 · answer #7 · answered by foongwk140804 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Chelsea because of Frank Lampard.
2007-03-16 02:54:09 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
1 man utd
2 chelsea
3 arsenil
4 liverpool
5 spurs
2007-03-15 21:30:17 · answer #9 · answered by pranoykedarnath(subri) 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
it has to be chelsea. your question's on best strikers. and i think drogba and shevchenko both fit your bill. just that shevchenko isn't scoring as much as he should be.. koula's turning into a pretty efficient striker too..
2007-03-15 19:27:13 · answer #10 · answered by saints fan 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋