Sure. I disagree with his policy on illegal immigration. However I think that no matter how many Republicans admitted to this that we wouldn't see this question again and again.
2007-03-15 17:51:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by JudiBug 5
·
2⤊
3⤋
I'm a Republican and sure I disagree with some of the things done in this administration just as I sometimes agree with what the democrats have done. Lately tho if it's something I don't like that the President does it's backed up by the Democratic Congress. Go figure. Like with the illegals, both seem to whimp out on that issue.
2007-03-16 01:05:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
There are lots of Republicans who disagree with things this administration has done.
Why would you thing differently ?
But do you really think, just because a Republican disagrees with certain things this administration has done, they are going to side with the Democrats?
There has never been a President in American history, that had complete party support for every action or policy they took.
Both political parties are too diverse to have have complete agreement on policy issues within the party.
2007-03-16 00:48:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by jeeper_peeper321 7
·
5⤊
0⤋
His stand on amnesty is all wrong. There is too much compassion in his conservatism.
The Reason this country is the land of opportunity is over our history we have invested in infrastructure both the wealthy & poor can use to create wealth. The illegals have disproved the notion that the poor can't climb out of their poverty without government help. If being poor in the US was so bad the illegals wouldn't have fought to get here.
To make the 3rd world also a land of opportunity their governments need to invest in infrastructure. The 1st world use to invest in those countries, but the leaders chose to nationalize the assets. SHORT term the locals were inriched long term they have less jobs.
2007-03-16 20:48:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by viablerenewables 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have voted Republican nearly straight ticket in all elections since I was 18 (38 now).
I disagree with a good majority of the things that this administration has done...keeping Rumsfeld around was the #1 mistake made by Bush.
However, I do agree with a lot of things attempted by the President as well.
2007-03-16 00:43:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by Gotta Question 2
·
6⤊
2⤋
As much as I had to hold my nose while I pulled that voting lever - I thought of the alternative. I am going to do the same. Because in my opinion the worst Republican is better than the best Democrat.
2007-03-16 01:45:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by caciansf 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
I'm an Independent who votes the person not the party. My objection to President Bush is he should have gotten an honest consensus before we entered Iraq.
Now that we are there I find no honor in leaving before the people vote their own system into place.
How horrible of us to start something and not finish ~~~ leaving millions of people without hope of freedom.
I also believe that the Iraq's need to fight harder to free themselves from tyranny.
2007-03-16 01:09:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by scottyusa1 4
·
3⤊
1⤋
Sure. I think they have put too much restriction on the rules of engagement for our troops. If they are to win, they need to be allowed to engage the enemy and fight. The way to win is to attack. When they are restricted like they are, it puts many of our soldiers lives in jeopardy.
Secondly, I think they could do a better job getting these gas prices down. They made alot of promises to the working man, but have yet to deliver in this area.
I'm 100% conservative, but I also remember that Republicans are politicians too, and they're going to look after #1 before they'll look after me.
2007-03-16 00:44:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by C J 6
·
4⤊
3⤋
there appear to be very few. And the ones that do disagree with him still back him 100%, because after all, he is The President. No one would follow someone blindly into a burning building because they know it is wrong, but they still seem to follow this guy blindly even though they know he is wrong.
2007-03-16 00:44:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by truth seeker 7
·
4⤊
5⤋
YEP - they should have fired all 93 US attorneys
Like Bill Clinton DID in 93
except - W does not have a pending Whitewater case
so he can put a crony in place (Oh did Bill do that!)
2007-03-16 00:43:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by tom4bucs 7
·
5⤊
3⤋