The thing was, that he was asked for "his personal" opinion, not the majority of what the army has to say. However, the saying also can go like this.
If homosexuality is immoral, and that there is no place for homosexuality in the armed forces, then why is it criminals can serve in the military but gays or lesbians or bisexuals can not?
About a month ago I read an article, that the ARMY has let some people with "questionable background" (criminals with felony charges and others) was given a waiver(excuse) so that they can serve in the ARMY. Is this not telling us that, "Hey you can go do anything you want, kill, rape, or assault, don't matter, as long as you are okay with going to Iraq, we'll take you out of jail or make sure that you don't have to go to jail. Hell, we even give you benefits if you come back home alive and we all can tell the american people that you are a hero, side the fact that you were jailed for armed robery, grand theft, or sexual assault on a minor." How's that sounds? Good? Here, signed here on the dotted line.
Is that immoral? I don't think that is even ethical.
2007-03-15 23:35:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
What really upsets me is how Congressman Barry Frank stated that if our military was so afraid of homosexuals.The enemy could get a group of lesbians together and chase us out of Iraq.He just as same as called our military cowards when the truth is he is the coward. Our men and woman have proved that they don't run from nothing.Yet nothing has been said about Franks comment,but let a brave man like Gen. Pace give his opinion and there all over it.Makes you wonder who the good guys really are doesn't it ?
2007-03-15 23:35:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by don_steele54 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I, for one, do not agree with his bigoted comments. People like him should be killed and burned.
You have your head so far up your *** that you can probably remove your own appendix from the inside.
2007-03-15 23:27:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋