I haven't actually heard any ideas that would allow us to succeed in Iraq, have they officially given up?
2007-03-15 16:19:14 · 8 answers · asked by Reynaldo 3 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
They are doing exactly what they should do to ensure the loss of democratic government in Iraq. They incessantly state that we are losing, that our leaders are lying to us, and that resistance is futile. These are calculated to demoralize our population and our troops, as well as the Iraqis we are assisting. This in turn encourages the enemies.
2007-03-15 18:44:41 · answer #1 · answered by The First Dragon 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
The Dems want to pull out and regroup. Even one Democrat Senator Murtha from PA wants to cut the funding for ammo and weapons for our boys. Basically they want to cut and run. Okay, lets say we do. The Iraqi Army isn't ready to defend itself, the Government is so weak they will be overrun. If we leave,then what was the use of capturing Saddam and hanging him. I believe the Dems are more worried about TV time and bashing each other, running for 08 presidency.
2007-03-15 16:35:12 · answer #2 · answered by Twiggy 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
They are already waging a war - on The War on Terror . John Kerry & Ted Kennedy are the top two contributing senators who give aid & comfort to our enemy - while insulting our brave military while they dodge bullets . Kerry , for one slanders our country , here & abroad . If the Democrats really , really wanted to be more obvious than they are now - they would send over more John Walker Lindh's - to help insurgents aim at our troops .
2007-03-15 16:43:41 · answer #3 · answered by missmayzie 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
keep the war going. it cant be won. all this is just another vietnam. this isnt the bronze age, you cant win a war on foreign turf the way we are doing it. its been proven time and time again. if harry truman were alive, he would tell you. they just dont learn, and thats the frustrating part. it has nothing to do with political parties, its big business. all those countries are dirt poor. theyve got nothing to offer but oil. people here have invested there, and they see the profits going down to nothing. i dont think it has anything to do with weapons of mass distruction, all countries have those. its got nothing to do with hussain, there are much worse dictators out there, but we do nothing about them. the gasoline engine has been obsolete for over 20 years. there have been alternative energy recources that have been ignored for years because of the fossil fuel industry. this country has the means to be totally self-sufficient as far as energy, food, and just about anything else except for maybe wicker. we have for a long time, theres just too many rich people with foriegn interests that would lose too much. in short, we have enough problems over her that could be resolved if we wernt over there. it took 6 years for bush to warn us about social security when that was one of his campaign promises and hes the one whos been milking it dry. go figure
2007-03-15 17:00:45 · answer #4 · answered by chris l 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
If they want to lose the war in Iraq all they have to do is continue yielding to the demands of Bush, Cheney and the Republicans. That crew has yet to make one good decision.
"Mission accomplished!" -- G.W. Bush, the idiot king.
2007-03-15 17:20:56 · answer #5 · answered by AZ123 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Lose what? We're not at war.
-----------------
Why the 'thumbs down'? There's been no declaration of war, except on 'terror', which is a methodology, not a state.
War on Al Qaeda, then? AQ wasn't even IN Iraq until Bush opened the borders to them.
2007-03-15 16:30:27 · answer #6 · answered by laffryot 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
they'd pull out the troop s right now.
2007-03-15 16:50:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Nothing. They would be doing exactly what they are doing. Coincidence? I don't think so.
2007-03-15 17:41:15 · answer #8 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋