English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Many feminists criticize pornography for "objectifying" women, or portraying them as sexual "objects". What's the difference between that and portraying the natural sexual beauty of a woman? Or even the natural erotic excitement of a sexual act between two people?

2007-03-15 15:34:40 · 1 answers · asked by rainfingers 4 in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

1 answers

If you like porn like an average guy there is nothing wrong with it but as long as you know you aren't watching reality.

The women are paid and told what to do by the director. It isn't as intimate as you think and far from natural. The women are often in submissive positions and perform to make the man happy in the porn films. Most of the orgasms in the films are fake and in most porns the audio is dubbed over to make it more appealing for men. It is degrading to see a man ejaculate in a woman's face like on the films.

2007-03-16 08:23:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers