Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Al Qaeda's no. 3 admits to planning the terrorist attacks on 9/11. He made the admittal at Gitmo during a hearing at the base. He also admitted to planning other attacks such as the 1993 attack on the World Trade Center as well as bombing a nightclub in Indonesia and a failed shoe bomb attack on US planes.
This is according to a transcript released by the Pentagon on Wednesday.
2007-03-15 15:21:41 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes, but what is your question?
2007-03-15 15:24:32 · answer #1 · answered by Mary 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I am not clear on your question.
But the responses are interesting. A number of folks seem to believe that the answer isn't possible because the individual is from the Middle East. I have to wonder if they realize that he speaks English.
But let's assume for the moment that he was coerced into making these statements. If such is the case, are those buying into this new "conspiracy theory" taking the position that he is innocent and should be released?
It creates an interesting paradox for the Bush-Bashing crowd. Which is more important, attacking the President, or punishing the individual who, according to the 9/11 Commission Report, planned the attack on the World Trade Center?
It is a question that most of these folks seem to want to avoid.
2007-03-15 15:44:39 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
so I hardly believe that so many are solely responsible . This is just part of the big govt lie about 9/11 . They make things up as they go so fast as to become transparently false. I want The Bush confession . The evidence is beyond cover up.
Did they have a confession from Castro in the bay of pigs too ? Pres. Kennedy certainly didn't think so. Is the pentagon still standing by the WMD decision? It's truly a pity how much we are lied to by our govt...!
2007-03-15 15:32:22 · answer #3 · answered by dogpatch USA 7 · 5⤊ 2⤋
I wouldn't beleive it. It's all a publicity stunt. If you torture somebody enough,they'll admit to causing The Great Depression.
2007-03-15 16:22:41 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
A remarkable confession, held and tortured since 2003. If we're just interested in charging someone, that works but if we really care about guilt or innocence, I question torture.
2007-03-15 15:33:34 · answer #5 · answered by Middleclassandnotquiet 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
He is just another scape goat. He was either paid to make the confession, or he was tortured into it! Either way, I'm not buying it, I think it is a crock! **sm*
2007-03-15 19:15:11 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sounds like you're asking if this statement goin around is actually true. And I have no idea if it is. Knowing the media, there was probably more to it than that, that they have cut out.
2007-03-15 15:36:05 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Jen, I hate to tell you this, but all these folks like to take the credit for this horrible act of terrorism. This is nothing to be proud of and he will most likely burn in hell which I think is too good for his sorry butt. You are not telling most of us anything we didn't already know. However, what is you question? Please don't give people like this a stage to spread their BS. He is evil!!! Pure evil!!!
2007-03-15 15:34:20 · answer #8 · answered by Cindy Roo 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Sure I believe this statement it makes alot sense, if i was a gullible sheep BAAH BBAAAH BULLSH-T!!
2007-03-15 17:19:26 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm surprised he didn't take responsibility for the Libby leak.
2007-03-15 15:35:23 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
We have all heard,read/discussed this today and I appreciate your statement.
Was there Question?
2007-03-15 15:28:43 · answer #11 · answered by LN has3 zjc 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋