You can't have it both ways folks!
2007-03-15 15:18:53 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The liberals are trying desperately to discredit these confessions. And they're being very subtle about how they spin their news releases to this end.
The picture of this dirt bag, for instance, in such a disheveled mess and looking pretty ragged - was taken when he was captured and doesn't represent any mistreatment by the Americans what so ever. No date or reference is made to this fact.
Every article I've seen emphasizes the "water boarding" and torture and on and on - but fails to acknowledge the timetable when this took place vs. his recent confessions.
I strongly believe that these confessions would not have been released unless there was a lot of collaborating evidence - and the dirt bag spewed out information that could have been privy only to someone truly responsible or at the least involved with the initial planning and execution of the terror attacks involved.
I would like to add, that even as a conservative, I am still bothered by the fact that the REAL mastermind
and financier hasn't been accounted for as yet.
2007-03-15 16:17:18 · answer #1 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no longer likely, the u . s . isn't between the common third international murderous totalitarian regimes you liberals are continuously so in touch for. Even those in protection stress custody have criminal protection interior the path of the JAG and below different conventions. in fact that this pile of crap who's in the back of each and all the terrorist assaults you dont look to care approximately, won't be confessing, he's bragging. in case you may worry to envision the countless transcripts of the confessions, he aint sorry approximately something he has performed to all those harmless human beings in huge apple, in DC, in Indonesia, or everywhere else. he's happy with it. by employing the way, have you ever learnt that he needs all of YOU to die and pass to hell? nevertheless so in touch approximately his rights? nevertheless opt to incorporate him and tell him that's all going to be ok? awaken!
2016-10-01 00:04:41 · answer #2 · answered by schiraldi 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
My answers expressed are my own. Don't try to lie and pin it on all "liberals". And may I remind you, I'm a moderate.
Personally, I believe he's tired of being in limbo and decided to confess in order to martyr himself. "Dozens of virgins in paradise" beats sitting in a jail cell. Perhaps he thinks we (meaning "the government") will execute him faster the more stuff we might believe he's guilty of. It plays into his hands.
Also, it does us the disservice of needing to look for more suspects. If we believe he did everything he claims, it means we (again, "the government") will slow down or even stop looking for the real suspects who committed those crimes.
I don't believe he could have done all he's copped to. It's a lot. I bet he'd admit to hiding the WMDs (which were not there) if he thought they'd believe him.
Conservatives: use your brains for once. The man is evil and calculating as hell. A man like that will never break and confess like that unless he believes it's to his advantage.
Skylor Williams
2007-03-15 15:37:21 · answer #3 · answered by skylor_williams 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I haven't heard any real liberals say that his confession was a bad thing or that he should be released...if you really have that much trouble dealing with reality, naybe you should just watch TV for a while
2007-03-15 15:30:13 · answer #4 · answered by Ford Prefect 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I wish that they'd tevevise his exectuion! The guy is a mass murderer we ned to find the most degrading way for him to be executed which would offend any of his fanatical friends and do it! maybe allow a 2000 lb boar to have his way with him first
2007-03-15 22:19:33 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I didn't hear that either. But if someone did, maybe it's because they think the authorities are blaming him for everything so they don't have to admit they haven't caught the guys who really did it, like bin Laden. Remember him?
2007-03-15 15:30:21 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Liberals are just upset because Mohammed validated what the current administration has been preaching for years.
2007-03-15 15:21:52 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
when did liberals discredit the guy's confession? i don't think they did. i didn't.
2007-03-15 15:23:09 · answer #8 · answered by !{¤©¤}! 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Interesting thought! I wouldn't be surprised. After all, he's one of those poor, persecuted terrorists in gitmo.
2007-03-15 15:22:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
I'm advocating for his immediate execution.
2007-03-15 15:22:45 · answer #10 · answered by Tom B 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋