Is everyone created equal ? Is blue blood genes have something different?
2007-03-15 15:07:42 · 21 answers · asked by batkenshin 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Royalty
We all bleed red. Royal blood just means a line of distinction. Royals are only royals because they can trace their lineage back to even more so called royals. Which at some point I think all of us can.
2007-03-15 15:14:34 · answer #1 · answered by CROSS-EYED PENGUIN 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
The difference is power and entitlement. Most people associate wealth with Royalty, but that is not necessarily the case, a royal blood descendant need not be rich, as many monarch no longer exist and have lost their power and wealth.
AFAIK their is no genetic differences per say (except for the obvious differences associated with individuals of the human race).
However, whilst it is assumed that all people are created equal, evidence from the real world shows that this is far from true. (Olympics, Academia, Wealth, Beauty, etc)
If we were all equal, then we there would be no point to sport, tests, contests, etc because there would always be a tie.
Whilst all races are equal, the same cannot be said about individuals. Even the founding fathers of the USA were hypocritical in their "All men are created equal" diatribe, as they allowed slavery and inequality to exist between the genders.
2007-03-16 21:03:48 · answer #2 · answered by Mike J 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes. Everyone is created equal and we all have the same blood. Royalties are called blue blood coz blue is a royal color so if youre born to a royalty you have blue blood. Theres nothing really different from a commoners blood from a royal blood except for their ancestors who are known to be royalties.
2007-03-16 00:05:33 · answer #3 · answered by tmi_shadows 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Royal blood is abviously in breeding by other monarch family from other race, an integration of Danish royals and Koreans of Japan back 1600 -Angles and Saxe back 480BC, Danish and Akbr york of Jolo back 1700, The Coburg of Berlin and Manchuria Russia. All these royal families are integrated to one another, And these results to a blood uncommon to everyone.
Because of these extreme exclusive integration there is an hormonal exclusiveness of immunity in every royal people that is very uncommon. Now because of this uncommon genes once it is to be integrated to a normal citizen the sibling will not be develop comes abnormalities like downsyndrome celebral palsy etc. One problem if a royal man marries a common citizen most couple are childless.
In my part to be honest I am still single and I had no wish to marry not to my causins of hypocrates attitudes and some with mobs blood. Not being hypocrate just being practical I dont mind, I value my freedom as a person. But I am not going to hung myself to the cross just because my blood is Bplus. Closed my eyes to all intrigues.Enjoy life with my friends everywhere like now in sentimental expression, But How I wish I could find the man i am going to love live 4ever that i am to rule under my skirt...
2007-03-17 02:01:05 · answer #4 · answered by PRINCESS AQUIRAH 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Everyone is "created" equal, it's the importance we place upon others that causes the disparity. There's these five royals. And there's 800,000 citizens. Who's the power here? Hm. The difference between royals in modern society is their place to represent the public. If they tried any of the things monarchies of the past did, they'd be handled rather quickly. Monarchies of the present are showpieces and nothing more. A relic of the past...with a missing chromosome here or there.
2007-03-16 03:21:53 · answer #5 · answered by neutralitybias 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Royal blood is blue because the kings drink blue ink...
Seriously, the so-called royal blood refers to the blood inside of a person that descends from royalty, but, from a scientific point of view, it has the same qualities as my blood, your blood... The genes are different, indeed, but nobody says that they are better. I know some prince, somewhere, whose ancestors' genes didn't help him too much in as far as his appearance is concerned (he's ugly, I mean), and who cheated on a woman that was far too beautiful for him. And this is only one example.
2007-03-15 22:18:39 · answer #6 · answered by mrquestion 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
On an emmergency situation, royal blood cannot be crosshaired to anyone, if you extract a little amount it appear like mud, and if it will be poured on a white cloth it colour wine, that is why american doctors can easily identify royal blood. Cases like this espeacially on time of birth delivery or ceasareans,the doctors and nurses and anesthesiologist will toast their licence if they are willing to help the royal patient,cause it will be operated without blood and it should be done hastily. Only expert american doctors can do this, actually despite of all negative opinions royals are always the victims of medical mysteries. However their are lots of new technologies now a days to combats all these med problems.
2007-03-16 05:24:55 · answer #7 · answered by DARRIGOULD U 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No they are no different anatonomically. It is just about blood lines of the royal family that are referred to as blue blood.
2007-03-23 18:49:28 · answer #8 · answered by just me 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Blood is blood. Everyone has the same colour blood. The term "blue blooded" is to describe someone of an aristocracy.
2007-03-16 13:53:57 · answer #9 · answered by Sarah* 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well in the old english day most High society people did not go outside much, and if they did, they wore a hat or umbrella. So most of them naturally were very pale, because of this you could see their veins under the skin easily and our veins are blue so they gave them the nickname bluebloods.
2007-03-16 19:33:50 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋