If troops under their command commit war crimes does that make Bush and Blair war criminals?

Answer 1

No. The rules for vicarious liability in criminal matters say that a person is culpable only if the personally commit the crime, or if they order or directly assist someone in committing the crime.

Bush (or Blair) is not a war criminal simply because some individual soldiers in their military chose to commit such crimes.

Bush is a war criminal because he personally violated and personally ordered violations of 18 USC 2441, which is the federal statute that defines war crimes. See the recent Supreme Court decisions that have confirmed this fact.

Answer 2

Certainly, not only for that civil crime, but also for all the other secret murders that have happened whilst these two have been in power. Neither Bush or Blair are heads of governments they are running tyrannies.
I believe that they had something to do with the murder of the professor who said that there was no real threat of chemical war from Iraq.
Just look at the global problems that they have caused with a violent race of people. This is of course Vietnam 2.
Ignorance may be bliss, but the consequences are similar to signing contracts with devils. If we turn a blind eye to the tyrannies then it won't be long before we become the victims.

Answer 3

Well the German high command were tried as war criminals, however most of the top men were dead by the time the war ended so no president. However I think that as the war was based on lies that maybe they are, remember that the invasion of Poland by Germany was started by Germans posing as Poles!!!

Answer 4

War criminals are usually leaders of any country that contributes to the death of lots of innocent civilians.
Draw your own conclusion about Bush and Blair.

Answer 5

No. But the issue really is, should Bush and Blair be indicted for launching an unlawful war.

Answer 6

NOPE! It's like saying if a teenager commits crimes does that make the parents criminals?

Answer 7

What conflict crimes did Saddam Hussein dedicate??? what number tens of millions have Islamic fundamentalists killed??? do not we've the accountability to do something?! could we sit on our palms and say, "ok, i'm no longer likely to do something about the people you opt for to homicide, in simple terms so someone gained't imagine poorly of me..."???!! it really is quite absurd! in case your little brother or sister were getting the tar beat our of them, ought to you do something? If someone replaced into being attacked in vast sunlight hours, in the approach an intersection, ought to you in simple terms stand there??? Thank God someone did something. state of no pastime=lack of life! more advantageous powerful to die status up than laying down! in case you don't love the stance Islamic Fundamentalists have taken adverse to the USA of a, perchance you should flow some position risk-free, like Canada or France. Oh, wait. there have been incidents of terrorism there as well...

Answer 8

No. And the stance that you adopt against the west is somewhat distasteful. Why don't you get a life and spend some time in the real world instead of the virtual world that you inhabit, and which seems to fill you with hate and bile.

Answer 9

A great American president,Harry Truman once said,"The buck stops here" and kept a sign on his desk to that effect in the White House. Bush and Bliar do not subscribe to this idea,their policy is to 'pass the buck'.

Answer 10

Criminal Record Search Database : http://SearchVerifyInfos.com/Official