2007-03-15 14:44:05 · 16 answers · asked by howard h 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
As little as they are they still fight to live. Thats kind of like voting.
2007-03-15 14:56:47 · update #1
From the womb...I WANT TO LIVE DAMN YOU!!!
2007-03-15 14:49:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think that the child who is born into a loving, stable and safe home to parents willing and capable of caring for him/her and providing him/her with the things necessary to thrive and grow would be likely to be anti-abortion.
On the other hand, the drug addicted child born to a mother who left him in a dumpster in a back alley somewhere and who laid there suffering until he died would be more likely to have preferred not to have been tortured for an additional nine months before reaching the same eventual end. Same goes for the child who is brutally abused until death by the parents who were supposed to love him.
So, just like with adults, it would all be a matter of perspective.
Then again, if babies could vote, the answer could likely be predicted based on the party shown on their Voter's Registration Cards.
2007-03-15 14:52:38 · answer #2 · answered by bubbleblunder 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If babies could vote, they would all vote pro-life. They all want a chance to live. But, WAIT, they got to live in the first place. If all embryos could vote, they would all vote pro-life.
2007-03-15 14:52:18 · answer #3 · answered by istitch2 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Pro-choice. Ask one that's in constant, wracking pain. Ask one who's having cigarettes put out on her chest. Ask one who can't get enough food or medicine because of government cutbacks to pay for this stupid war amongst many other things. Not until every baby is WANTED should a bunch of crooked old politicians decide what's right for every female in this country. All you so-called pro-lifers are so interested in every baby until it comes out and your ever precious tax dollar has to be spent on a child instead of a bridge in alaska. What a bunch of hypocrites!...
2007-03-15 14:55:58 · answer #4 · answered by conx-the-dots 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Can you really trust a baby to make the right choice? And in which trimester would they get the right to vote?
2007-03-15 14:52:37 · answer #5 · answered by Bob 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I favor they could in simple terms call it like it really is somewhat of putting sweet euphamisms on it: professional-selection and professional-life. it really is professional-abortion or anti-abortion, both for or adverse to. professional-selection receives rid of the nasty be conscious "abortion" and is putting forward you've the alternative to abort or no longer; accordingly spinning a nicer thanks to assert I want people's proper for abortion on call for. And whoever invented "professional-life" is putting its personal spin on it. so some distance as implementing morality typically united states, are not maximum all guidelines implementing moral criteria on society? Abortion isn't said in the Bible, except causing an damage to a pregnant mom the position she loses her new child. it really is formerly the medical community practiced it. i don't be conscious of how this were given pinned on the non secular community. possibly those of religion could in simple terms have more advantageous powerful morals. i do not seem at it a lot as coming from a religious view. If it really is a previous due form of birth control it really is a mom killing her new child. all of us all began in that state, it really is a individual, and that i'm adverse to killing it because it really is invconvenient. in lots of parts of the international they abort previous due in the 0.33 trimester even as the toddler ought to proceed to exist outdoors the womb, utilizing partial start abortion the position they tear out products of the toddler at a time. The ultrasound video "Silent Scream" confirmed the newborn's mouth flow huge open crying even as being torn to products, assisting ban previous due time period abortions in the U.S. What it comes right down to is a selfish mentality that opts for amorality the position people opt to flee with homicide with assistance from by some means putting forward it really is no longer a human, it really is a fetus.
2016-11-25 22:59:40 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
George W. Diaper
2007-03-15 14:51:09 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Congratulations, you win the award for the silliest, most inane question of the day.
2007-03-15 14:57:13 · answer #8 · answered by Team Chief 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
you're a man and you do not have the right over a womans body, stop dragging this fight on , grow up
2007-03-15 15:47:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
What a ****ing stupid question. I doubt there are many suicidal fetuses.
I'm pro-choice btw.
2007-03-15 14:52:21 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I guess a lot of it would have to do if their new pregnant moms could afford to feed them and strill bring more children into the world.
2007-03-15 14:48:20 · answer #11 · answered by wizjp 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋