I am writing an argument paper for a Critical Thinking class, and would appreciate any input you might have...or any laws you can think of that applies in this situation. Thank you in advance for any serious answer.
2007-03-15 13:47:23 · 7 answers · asked by signa b 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Parents are often held responsible for not giving proper supervision a.k.a. underage drinking in home, underage sex,
& small children wandering off & etc. While constant supervision of internet is not possible, allowing children complete control of the Internet can allow them to be decieved into porn, inappropiate relationship for child predators. States have different laws - check with your state.Someone must be held responsible & the child is too young. Stricter laws would force parents to do their duty to their own children.
2007-03-15 13:57:32 · answer #1 · answered by Wolfpacker 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
so some distance as 'on no account asserting infants ought to be taken out of their residences', what precisely do you assume to take place whilst the government is provided in and costs the mum and dad with ignore and baby abuse? Do you think of the judges are going to condemn the mum and dad to a loose 3 hundred and sixty 5 days of vegan lollipops? Are you heavily happy with the belief of the government workout ordinary this point of ability over the lives of that's electorate? using fact i'm no longer. and there's a huge distinction between ravenous a baby and allowing infants to eat nutrients that's no longer unavoidably the healthiest for them. And specific, I even have an theory of what it takes to get a baby taken out of a house. Charging the two mum and dad with baby abuse, that's many times a legal, could take those mum and dad a protracted way down that street whether it did no longer consequence in instant removal.
2016-09-30 23:57:13 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I dont think that parents should be charged because 1.. de internet is kinda new to most parents...and the ability that we have now..most of them dont posses..and no matter what security thingy u buy for ur cpu ur child if he is smart enough WILL get pass it..trust me i no :)..
P.S am not sayin dat parents are dumb or anything but seriously there is not mush they can do about it + even if ur child cant get pass the fire wall + etc....but he is determined to watch porn or w.e he or she will find any cpu or way to do it...:)
sry for spellin am kinda sleepy
2007-03-15 14:24:40 · answer #3 · answered by BAM! 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes
2007-03-15 13:52:18 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
SILLY THINKING IN A BOX.
SHOULD PARENTS BE CHARGED IF A CHILD DAMAGES
THEIR HEARING WITH STUPID LOUD MUSIC?
SHOULD PARENTS BE CHARGED IF A DAUGHTER GETS PREGNANT AT 13?
PARENTS SHOULD BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CERTAIN AMOUNTS OF SUPERVISION... 24 HOUR A DAY SUPERVISION ISN'T POSSIBLE...
MATTER OF FACTLY SCHOOLS AND LIBRARIES AND HOMES OF FRIENDS PROVIDE INTERNET ACCESS.
LORD KNOWS WHO WOULD BE CHARGED WITH ACCESSORY AND CONTRIBUTING TO DRUG USAGE
IF ONE GETS TO POINTING LIBERAL FINGERS..
SHOULD PARENTS BE CHARGED IT THEIR 15 YEAR SON GETS A 15 YEAR OLD GIRL PREGNANT?
SHOULD PARENTS BE CHARGED IF A PERSON DROPS OUT OF SCHOOL OR JUST REFUSES TO LEARN AND NEVER AMOUNTS TO A HILL OF BEANS?
SHOULD TAX PAYERS BE CHARGED WITH WAR CROMES FOR A PRESIDENT'S LYING AND STARTING A WAR WITH IRAQ WHERE TENS OF THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE HAVE BEEN MURDERED?
2007-03-15 14:04:53 · answer #5 · answered by cork 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think so, after all look at what that 13 old boy did at the public Library- The I Love You virus!
2007-03-15 13:52:33 · answer #6 · answered by Bluelady... 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes I sure think so! Old enought to do the crime, They dam well can pay the crime!
2007-03-15 15:00:18 · answer #7 · answered by My Nut!!! 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋