Bin Laden attacks America....so Bush goes after Iraq instead? Why?
2007-03-15 13:18:43 · 20 answers · asked by Villain 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
We can find Saddam hiding in a hole, but we cannot find a 6'4" Muslim who needs to tote around a dialysis machine?!?!
It stinks to high hell.
I honestly think he did it to take away the attention from Bin Laden, not for oil or to bring "democrazy" to a nation.
*edit* heh..ok, I laughed at the See-BS thing. That's funny.
2007-03-15 13:23:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
Bin laden is part of the Bin laden family which has close ties to the Bush family. Maybe the other family members asked him to not kill Osama Bin Laden. After 911 many royal family members and Bin Laden family members went to Afgahnistan to Osama's daughter's wedding. That's after pledging to join the war on terror. President Bush said he wanted him dead or alive, then a few years later said he didn't think about him much anymore.
2007-03-15 13:34:35 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Why did no longer bill Clinton? He became provided to him thrice!!! however the factor is that 9/11 nonetheless might have happened no count number if Bin weighted down became caught or no longer! He has extra effective than adequate people working under him, experienced nicely adequate that they do no longer want him. We took Sadam out of Iraq, did that eliminate the subject? No, he's largely a bite of the puzzle. you spot, until somebody palms over Bin weighted down we are able to by no ability get him. There are a guidance on a thank you to many caves, holes and ditches for him to cover in and much to many people keen to cover him. yet i might rather want to work out him fry if we do get some fortunate wreck and by some ability seize him.
2016-10-18 11:58:11 · answer #3 · answered by shakita 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Families Saud, Bin Laden, and Bush have been friends and business partners for decades. In fact it was Bin Laden money that bailed Dubya out of at least one of his many failed business ventures.
2007-03-15 13:26:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
He said from the beginning, the war on terror doesn't stop with Bin Laden. Besides, he's more than likely been dead for couple of years now
2007-03-15 13:34:39 · answer #5 · answered by BAARAAACK 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
One does not go after one's partners.
Add:
Bush not only said he wanted Bin Laden dead or alive, He said he wanted to fvck Bin Laden in the *** really hard (no exaggeration!!). Bush is such a HOMO!!!!
2007-03-15 13:25:33 · answer #6 · answered by eatmeneocon 2 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Two reasons,
1. Bin Ladin isn't sitting on an oil well.
2. Halliburton couldn't figure out how to make billions in
Afghanistan so we HAD to go into Iraq.
See, isn't that simple?
2007-03-15 13:26:17 · answer #7 · answered by justa 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Old family friends. That's the only way I think it can be explained. The GOP and neo-cons also needs a perpetual enemy to keep money pouring into the military industrial complex and the oil industry so they can in turn, get money for their elections. It also ensures that they play out their doctrine of perpetual war for perpetual peace. It's very Orwellian but a true doctrine on their part.
2007-03-15 13:23:44 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 0⤋
CIA,has bin already,that's why..he probable eats Cheetos with the Pres in Saudi..cheers
2007-03-15 13:34:54 · answer #9 · answered by decider JR 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
even the FBI has admitted that they dont have enough evidence to charge Bin Laden.
Take a look at the WANTED POSTER .It is on the net.He isnt wanted for WTC attacks
2007-03-15 13:23:56 · answer #10 · answered by Paul I 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋