Is this THE solution to global warming?

Question

Could the government's global warming panel datamine the internet and media sources for the largest scale most economically benificial ways to reduce global warming emmisions they could directly implament through legislation to ban and phase out and replace all carbon dioxide producing technology and to incentivize and phase in newer cleaner replacement technology that currently exsists just waiting to replace that technolgy that's causing the problem?
It would, of course, make sense to start with the solutions that will reduce the largest percent of emmisions while being the most benifical to the economy at the same time first and then working away from that point as they look for the most attractive solutions and work there way towards the least.
Wouldn't this solve the problem while saving money and making money at the same?
Would taking the enviroment and economy into acount and comming up with actions that are benificial to both make both parties happy?

Could they also study how the hole in the ozone layer was fixed to come up with solutions? The ideas are dense and the sentences long so if you want to get what I'm sayying reading it slow, maybe a few times, and considering it concept by concept and taking them into context with eachother to get the abstract whole idea while you read it will help you actually get what I'm trying to say.

Answer 1

You got to think bigger. Lower the temperature of the Sun.

Answer 2

I like the condescending remarks at the end. Really sums up your arrogance.

Now on to your question. The only reductions in anything we need to rush out and do at the moment is getting away from foreign oil because it is best for us a s a nation and get away from burning coal because it is the right thing to do environmentally(acid rain). So far there is no proof that 1) that recent CO2 increases are man made, 2) If it is caused by human activity that it is the cause for warming temps and 3) that if it is the cause for warming temps to what extent.

There is no reason to seek reactionary solutions to unknown problems at this point. I do like the idea of moving toward economically beneficial changes, but only if the net result is an economic benefit.

Remember, the UN Commission on Climate Change only determined that it was "likely" that man is the cause of warming temps. There were many scientists part of the original commission that disagreed with the science and the findings and resigned the commission but were still credited on the report. There are respected scientists that disagree with the Commission's findings.

Answer 3

If you reduce the earths CO2 levels too much plant life and vegatation will die creating an even larger problem world wide. Commercial greenhouses pump higher levels of CO2 into them to stimulate plant growth. What man puts into the atmosphere CO2 wise is very small compared to what the world oceans do each day. Get beyond Al Gores agenda driven junk science and look at the real science behind global warming.

Answer 4

The co2 tax is coming thanks to Al (fake environmentlast)Gore. Now its the liberals turn to preach fear.The damage to earth is already done and we are fixing it but what about china ,russia,india and the middle east even africa where is their effort.Yet,Al Gore and the hollywood elite (wasters) can point thier fingers at us these people a joke.Hang Em' High that be good start for all Corporate Polluters/Oxygenthieves with their corporate jets and multi million dollar mansions in the hamptons.All wa$ting thier money on wacko politicians in these goofball fundraisers, that are based on lies about how we are the enemy and we should paying them a co2 tax for the good of global warming controls.After Bush there will be another devil and that is the "eco freindly" movement.

Answer 5

Population control

Answer 6

I like it. Very good thinking. I'd also like to suggest skipping over switch grass,corn ethanol, and especially nuclear and coal and going straight for solar, hydroelectric, geothermal, tidal, wind, electromagnetic and anything else that's virtually limitless in supply and clean.

Answer 7

It must be intoxicating to think that we are significant enough to affect the climate of this gigantic frickin Rock

Answer 8

corls for implantation to stop methaine