English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

if nero's government set fire to its own city, and hitler's government set fire to its own reitschtag (spelling?), did bush'e government set fire to the world trade center?

2007-03-15 11:28:35 · 18 answers · asked by greatceasarsghost 2 in Politics & Government Politics

documents now show that hitler's government did in fact set fire to a gov. building and blamed it on his political enemies (the communists that were in power before him)(this was before the war)

2007-03-15 11:36:55 · update #1

18 answers

I do see the connection now, thanks...lol

2007-03-15 11:32:54 · answer #1 · answered by leonard bruce 6 · 4 1

There are two kinds of Republicans. Rich ones and stupid ones. If your worth more than a million dollars, then I can at least understand why a person would vote Republican. Rich people want to stay rich, and simply don't care what happens to the rest of us. If you are not wealthy, and you can still find a reason other than abortion to even agree with the stuff Bush has done over the past 6 years, you are simply not very bright. Bush, Cheney, and the rest of his neo-con administration have destroyed even the semblance of a government. In case we have forgotton, the act of governing envolves service to your fellow man. I really cannot understand how seemingly intelligent people can argue in favor of what the Bush administration has done to this country.

I am not particularly liberal in my views, Democrats are just as corrupt, and immoral as Republicans. Reagan may have started the United States on the road to ruin, but Clinton nailed the economic coffin shut with NAFTA and GATT, so both sides have failed the people they were elected to govern. I truly believe both are part of the same corporate sponsered monster. I miss the United States I grew up in, I wish I had an answer as to why they refuse to protect it.

Media creates political polarization and the liberal vs neo-con mindset, and we just fall into our respective lines and start sniping at each other while they rob the tax coffers blind and destroy the country we all live in. I can't come to terms with such stupidity and won't accept the helplessness of simply doing nothing, Part of me feels people who allow such deciet and corruption deserve to be duped and abused, but the reasonable part of my rationale believes that most of us would change our government for the better if we could. No one, not liberal or conservative, intelligent or idiot wants to see the United States destroyed. But before we can save it, we must all get on the same side.

Ben Franklin was right, "united we stand, divided we fall". Nobody's going to catch us when we fall, so either we start acting like American's and lose the stupid labels or sit back, shut up and watch the destruction of our country like sheep. Perpetuating the disunity aids and abets the enemies of our country, who ever they may be. If we are stupid enough to allow the ruthless murder of our fellow man to go unpunished because we can't decide how to investigate the biggest single act of mass muder in our countries history because the murders claim any investigation is a "crack pot conspiracy theory" then they win and we lose.

It was a "conspiracy" there is no "theory" it is a fact. We must demand and pursue justice, or accept the impotentant horror of being defensless victims. But either way we must stop attacking each other and at the very least focus on the real enemy.

2007-03-15 12:03:14 · answer #2 · answered by blogbaba 6 · 2 0

for 5 substantial motives: a million) He pre-empitvely assaults different international locations that have by no ability posed as a gamble to america of a. 2) He has taken away many liberties in an attempt to 'take care of' the electorate. Patriot act, cord/telephone tapping, Habeus Corpus eradicated. 3) He has instilled concern in his citizenry in an attempt to convey forth spritied nationalism/patriotism. "With us, or against us." 4) the recent allegations that his government became in charge for 9/11, as to apply the attack as a pretext for oil administration and bigger international domination interior the mid-east. (Hitler burned the Reichstag) 5) He believes his is morally more advantageous to others using fact of his faith. (Hitler believed more advantageous race) There are additionally many techniques wherein they're distinctive...commencing with their oration skills. Bush is likewise plenty cuter.

2016-10-18 11:46:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Everyone should read these 10 false flags that changed the world. Acts of terrorism by governments are not new to society. As you've pointed out, this goes way back.

2007-03-15 11:34:38 · answer #4 · answered by jeb black 5 · 2 0

No, terrorists crashed planes into the World Trade Center. Thats a conspiracy what you said about Bush having a hand in it or being responsible. Something no one will be able to prove, at least not citizens.

The Russians bombarded Berlin. Hitler didn't do that.

I don't know much about Nero and Rome, so I can't be sure about that part.

2007-03-15 11:33:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 4

I don't think Bush had anything to do with some tin foil hat plot to take down the world trade center. I wouldn't put it past a couple of others though...

2007-03-15 11:38:32 · answer #6 · answered by diogenese19348 6 · 1 1

Good point!

There are a number of commonalities between all three, namely, a heavy influx of business influence over political issues. Fascism is fascism, and it's never good for the people.

2007-03-15 11:37:54 · answer #7 · answered by nora22000 7 · 2 0

What he set fire to is what was left for the respect held for the office of President of the United States.

2007-03-15 11:32:32 · answer #8 · answered by D.L. Miller 3 · 3 2

The Democrat Party believes that Clinton was involved in the attack on 9/11.
That's why Sandy Berger was sent to steal & destroy classified documents, in order to protect Clinton from the 9/11 Commission Investigation.

2007-03-15 11:34:19 · answer #9 · answered by wolf 6 · 4 3

well, i just can't stop wondering how that really bad pilot flew a jet 400+ mph 2 feet above the ground AND made a hairpin turn above the potomac river...

2007-03-15 11:32:56 · answer #10 · answered by cassandra 6 · 4 1

To Our Constitution,He called it a G.D. piece of paper.

2007-03-15 11:33:19 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

fedest.com, questions and answers