The NYPD found an 11th hour, suprise witness. To me it is a little suspec but that is my opinion.
Do you think the murderers of Sean Bell have a hope of now going to trial because of this? Would the killers "get away with murder" because they found a witness out of the blue?
2007-03-15 11:12:25 · 2 answers · asked by AntDU 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
***Ahh, the Grand Jury is nothing***
I want to be on the jury for the criminal trial. I want to be in the room when they are sentenced to manslaughter (or murder if I get my wish).
50 Shots. I want to hear a good explanation for that since you have yet to make up your mind.
2007-03-15 13:16:32 · update #1
i'd doubt the G jury would give much weight to this person. when you have a group of people all saying the same thing and one person tells a different story it is pretty obvious.
i think stopping to reload about says it all......
2007-03-15 11:27:10 · answer #1 · answered by buzzards27 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Would you find it any LESS "suspect" if the witness had been testifying for the prosecution? I think not, because it sounds to me like you've already made your mind up as to the guilt or innocence of the police officers.
I'm just glad you're not on the Grand Jury panel.
2007-03-15 18:42:57 · answer #2 · answered by Team Chief 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋