English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

8 answers

Americans just keep putting their nose in others business............

2007-03-15 12:48:46 · answer #1 · answered by ILSE 5 · 0 1

The Project for a New American Century (PNAC) is an influential think tank, and this war was basically their idea. Many people in the Bush administration and their supporters are closely tied to that organization, particularly Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz. Very early on in 1998 they said: "Unless we act, Saddam Hussein will prevail, the Middle East will be destabilized, other aggressors around the world will follow his example, and American soldiers will have to pay a far heavier price when the international peace sustained by American leadership begins to collapse." When Bush was running for president, he made it clear that he sympathized with this view. These are still the "official" goal of the war in Iraq: security and global stability.

That much is undeniable, what their real underlying reasons for taking this position is slightly more debatable. War in Iraq is certainly in the economic interests of many of these people, particularly with their ties to the energy and defense industries. The war was made politically possible by the hatred and fear stirred up by the 9/11 attacks. But there is no short and uncontroversial answer to why the US really invaded Iraq.

2007-03-15 13:40:58 · answer #2 · answered by dowcet 3 · 0 0

Post 9/11--My Take:

1. The US believed that Saddam allowed Al Queda training camps and was hiding Osama Bin Laden.

2. This was a good chance to get Saddam while telling the public we were going for Bin Laden in Afghanistan.

3. Then when we couldn't prove that, it was said that Saddam had WMD. Saddam was a smart cookie in that he allowed the U.S. and the World to believe he had something he didn't have.

4. Next thing we know we are invading Iraq with Bush telling the American people that Saddam is inhumane, dangerous to his people (this was true), and that the Iraq people deserve to be free and live in a democracy. Oh I can smell the oil and big business. Can't you?

5. Now we own the war. After 3000+ honorable soldiers dead, now we try to get out and save face.

2007-03-15 13:36:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

a similar reason the different large us of a interior the international has gotten in contact in wars interior the mideast for the previous century. they're attempting to regulate the international oil marketplace. interior the present case, the US desires to maintain production, to stay away from a scarcity. reducing the fee isn't an argument; on the different, the better the extra clever. it is undesirable national coverage using fact it helps the US to proceed to be based on oil, even to become extra and extra based on it, yet on the fee of countless, extremely high priced militia intervention. we are extremely blowing our protection budget and tying up a million/2 our military to subsidize our kinfolk oil marketplace. they're those that want a young grant, and a severe fee, and that's what this conflict is meant to furnish. And interior the tip we are able to might desire to alter to three determination capability base besides, or face a genuine economic disaster. the US ought to have started reducing its use of oil a minimum of thirty years in the past.

2016-10-18 11:41:53 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Short Answer: Freedom isn't free sweetie.

2007-03-15 11:04:04 · answer #5 · answered by John16 5 · 0 2

They thought it'd be fun to stick their nose in other people's business.

2007-03-15 11:05:20 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Americans are fat, lazy and don't want to walk anywhere.

2007-03-15 11:10:11 · answer #7 · answered by ty4all 3 · 0 1

they wouldnt give up their weapons of mass destruction

2007-03-15 11:02:06 · answer #8 · answered by zippoman1990 2 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers