I think it's about darn time.
2007-03-15 10:22:47 · 8 answers · asked by acfahmy 7 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
I agree. It makes things more interesting when everyone is mixed in together. You have more possibilities and more options for story lines. The brand extension was stupid idea to me from the jump.
2007-03-15 10:28:55 · answer #1 · answered by WHEELJACK 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it is bad since they dont face each other normally I understand a fued between one raw and one smackdown wrestler before wreste-mania but on a fequent basis it just gets raw peeps to watch smackdown and vice versa.It is all about the ratings not about what the fans want .
2007-03-15 17:41:17 · answer #2 · answered by Da Boy T 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are doing it because they werent getting enough money from singles and tna was doing really well...
Thats why i like tna competing with WWE because it makes WWE do better matches(Lol well once in a while)
But wrestlemania will be a shambles....only good match will be money in the bank
2007-03-15 18:12:49 · answer #3 · answered by Tna "We are Wrestling" 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its better for everyone. Wrestlers get more exposure to fans that wouldnt normally see them, fans get to see wrestlers they wouldnt normally seen and of course the WWE makes more $$$$.
Good for everyone
2007-03-15 17:32:28 · answer #4 · answered by Makaveli 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hell yes. Then more of their PPV's will actually be worth purchasing.
2007-03-15 17:28:15 · answer #5 · answered by HULK RULES!! 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, now i can see more matches worth purchasing.
2007-03-15 17:30:38 · answer #6 · answered by julie c~actress and WWE&TNA_FAN! 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It really doesn't matter to me!
2007-03-15 17:26:06 · answer #7 · answered by ♥**Me**♥ 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
WAT THE HELLL DOES THAT MEAN?
2007-03-15 18:58:10 · answer #8 · answered by Rocky 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋