iraq and darfur.?

0 ⤊

why are some so quick to say that all political means in in darfur have been exhausted so the US should use military means all the while saddam managed to go 17 resolutions and about the 17 years but the military option was wrong there. alot of people have died in both. is there a legitimate distinction between the two?

2007-03-15 09:46:14 · 3 answers · asked by BRYAN H 5 in News & Events ➔ Current Events

3 answers

Yes one has oil.

2007-03-15 09:55:59 · answer #1 · answered by PE7E 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋

My dear friend, Unfortunately, Darfur has no oil or nothing America can benefit from, that is a major difference.

2007-03-15 19:13:31 · answer #2 · answered by b_prince 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋

well we are not attacking darfur yet, I doubt that bush even knows where it is.

2007-03-16 00:26:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋