If the father wants abortion, but the mother says no, should he be absolved of any responsibility?

Answer 1

Yes.

Since the woman is the only person that has any legal right to decide whether to have the child or not, she should be the the only person with legal responsibility... for HER decision.

If you disagree then the man should share in the legal right to decide, anything less is a double standard.

The "you made a choice when you had sex" thing is ridiculous, the final and only choice lies with the mother.

And if mom has a problem with abortion she can put it up for adoption so that it can be loved by two financially able parents, instead of grow up with one deadbeat dad, and a broke *** irresponsible mother.

Answer 2

I actually don't believe so. Excuse my french but it was his d1ck that caused the pregnancy, so just because he doesn't want the responsibility, it's not ok for him to suggest the murder of a baby.
I believe the father should be held responsible no matter what. It is not fair for the father to just be able to sign all responsibility away and go find another woman to get pregnant while the mother is stuck with the tough choices: 1) murder her baby or get stuck with the responsibility of raising a child all alone. There is also the choice of offering the child for adoption, which is not an easy choice for the mother... While it might not make her feel as bad as abortion, it isn't exactly an easy thing for a woman to give up her flesh and blood.
People are so irresponsible these days.

Answer 3

That's what it's all about I suppose, responsibility, or to be more precise, the avoidance of it. That is a common contributor in matters of abortion, unfortunately, the prospect of impending respnsibility is not generally considered in moments of conception.

A father should want to provide for his child, even if he's reluctant to want the responsibility, he is still going to be expected to assume it when the time comes. I'm of a mind to think certain ways about those who would rather prohibit a life from continuing than provide for it once it's begun, scarcely do I feel as though abortion is justifiable, I hardly believe selfish inconsideration is a suitable example. He should be made to absorb his share of the costs involved. Though I'm inclined to believe the child would be better off without that particular father figure, parenthood takes on a whole new meaning when what's been expected has arrived, and any man that can look at his offspring and not feel love, is no man by my definition.

Answer 4

No. I don't think that would be fair, What if that father decided latter in life he wanted a relationship with that child. How would explain absolving his rights. I also don't think a woman should be able to have an abortion if the father is not in agreement. It takes two. Both should have to reach some kind of mutual ground or compromise.

Answer 5

Let me ask you this. If the mother wants an abortion and the father says no, should she be allowed to have one?

Or:

If the father decides he no longer wants the three year old, should he be absolved of all responsibility?

The time to choose whether you want to be a parent is before you climb into bed. If you don't want babies, put a love glove on it, or keep it in your pants.

Answer 6

that's aninteresting quetsion. i imagine pdooma and luvmy4boys suggested it exceedingly nicely. did you know ways many women human beings on ya and that i have run into in individual always say, my boyfriend/husband doesnt want to have a infant, how am i able to trick him? what am i able to do to get pregnant without him knowong it? and each of the girls that connect to a guy at a bar and say oh im on the pill dont use a condom. yeah the guy might want to do a more beneficial useful job of choosing who hes dozing with, yet its no longer basically his fault. particularly if the female is deliberately tricking him basically so she receives pregnant. ive seen a number of questions about right here, like is it terrible to be a unmarried mom? if i connect to a guy someplace, and if i dont tell him im pregnnat can he attempt to get custody later? what's inaccurate with some lady? yet then later they are going to say their infant has a worthless father. eeryone always places the blame on the daddy, for the being pregnant, for the childless father. at the same time as did the female quit having some thing to do with this? for those adult men that were tricked into being pregnant, possibly they ought to have a say like women human beings do. what number adult men needed a infant, and their female friend/spouse determined im nto waiting and went and had an abortion. some without even telling the daddy that they were pregnant. basically becasue its the womans body wearing the newborn doesnt recommend its in undemanding words the womans infant. very last i checked it nevertheless took 2 to make it. now i no longer retaining a mna might want to emphasize a woman to abort, yet like pdooma suggested, if he had say 12 weeks from the day he got here across out about being pregnant to signal away all rights, as a woman does to abort, than possibly there is alot a lot less unmarried moms. a lot less teenage pregnancies.

Answer 7

You could say no, but then if he dosent want her to have an abortion she should be able to sign away rights, and she would not have to pay child supoprt.


You could say yes, but then lazy men would be spreading their seed around like crazy.


Abortion is not meant to be birth control...although it is used that way and there is a double standard, a man cant get rights to save his child if he dosent want it aborted.

I thikn he should at least have to have some financial resposiblity though, its really not that much work to shell out a few bucks while someone is making huge sacrifices because of an accident that you were 50% responsible for.

Answer 8

Sorry Charlie, but it just does not work that way. The woman is in charge of her own body and you contributed the sperm. That means under the law you are the biological father and have a legal and moral obligation to that child from now on. If you mutually decided to terminate the child then you would still be morally at issue, but not legally.

Answer 9

No, I don't think he should be able to be absolved of any responsibility. He chose to have sex and that's the cause of the pregnancy so he should be fully responsible for it just like she is.

Answer 10

No, not really. He shouldn't have to be involved in the child's life, but should have to support the child, the same way he does if the child is born. If he doesn't want to have a child, then don't go having unprotected sex.
Think of the havoc it wreaks on welfare. And also, should the man be able to deprive the woman of a child that she wants and that he willing donated the sperm to make.

Answer 11

HELL NO! He is the father and if he didn't want to be one he already made his "choice" didn't he? No women should have to murder her own child because dad is a complete jerk. She is the one that will suffer all the physiological damage not him not to mention the poor child that is ground up like hamburger so dad can continue to lead his self centered party life. Men, take care of your kids there are no excuses.