So this game is a huge blowout, 58-29 with 13 minutes left. So I pose this question...is Louisville that good or is Stanford that bad? I attribute it to match up problems and coaching (Rick Pitino is the man after all)
2007-03-15 07:04:27 · 6 answers · asked by thuglife 5 in Sports ➔ Basketball
Stanford is young and untested. They had to travel to Cardinal country and play early (9:30 am PST). That being said, Pitino IS the man, and David Padgett (from Reno High School) is a stud.
2007-03-15 09:04:47 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
From watching the game I think its that Louisville is that much better. For one thing I think the competition that Louisville plays is much better during the year than what Stanford does. Thus this gives Louisville the leg up in the NCAA.
2007-03-15 07:11:20 · answer #2 · answered by ALASPADA 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Kinda begs the question....who would've rather seen Louisville vs Syracuse (or at least have the cuse in another bracket so that the same conference matchup did not occur)
I'm currently gloating to all those who disagreed with me about why Stanford should not have been in.
2007-03-15 08:21:19 · answer #3 · answered by psyduck702 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Stanford is that bad. Don't think Louisville will go that far in the tourney.
2007-03-15 07:09:39 · answer #4 · answered by Kenny 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Stanford should be in the NIT and someone like Syracuse should be in the Tourny
2007-03-15 07:17:49 · answer #5 · answered by YouKnowImRight 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Loiville is one of my fav teams since theyre coming from the big east, and they have a strong team, dont underestimate them, ppl kept saying they were going to be upseted
2007-03-15 07:47:15 · answer #6 · answered by brookyln baller 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋