Is it not better no to vote, than give the vote to a mediocre presidential candidate and give way to a new par

Question

if you have one bad apple and one bad orange, should you still bite any of them? or let them rott, and then sacrifice time and energy for a search of a better more exquisite fruit?

Answer 1

I believe that the right to vote is exactly that: the RIGHT to vote, not the duty to vote. I have never voted because I have never seen a candidate worth my vote (until now, if Fred Thompson runs).

If neither candidate represents what's important to me, then I have no obligation to vote for either just because popular opinion says I should vote for one.

On the other hand, if there is a candidate that I completely abhor, I may exercise the right to vote against that candidate. For example, If Hillary wins the Dem nomination, I will vote against her as long as the Republican candidate is not an adulterer or a drag queen or a Mormon or a slanderer, in which case I will leave the country.

Whew! Glad I got that out!

Answer 2

It is never a good idea not to vote. We have had presidents who were thought to be mediocre and wound up being very good. We have also had some that voters thought might be okay and would up being awful. The main thing is that the people have spoken. If the people want so so than that is what they shall have. Maybe that is all there is but it is better than nothing or a dictator both of which would be worse. If you don't vote you may get nothing or a dictator.

If you don't vote you didn't express your opinion at the time and therefore have no right to complain. Your vote may not go to the winner but if you voted that gives you more of a right to complain about the winner than if you don't vote at all. If you vote and your candidate wins than you should be happy unless that person betrays your trust and then you vote for their opponent next time or, if bad enough, excercise the collective right of the governed to change through recall or impeachment and formal removal.

Answer 3

It is always better to vote. Now, I keep reading about the lesser of two evils or neither candidate or whatever. There are more than two parties.

People should stop voting against someone and start voting for ideas. People should not vote for the person they think is going to win and start voting for right and wrong.

Some think that vote for a third party candidate is a waisted vote because they probably won't win. Maybe they won't win. But if the politicians in power begin to see a ground swell of third party vote you can bet they will change their ways.

Less then half the people in the US vote, so the same people stay in power with the same ideas. Why should they change when so many people don't vote. Why should they care?

Vote for ideas and not for parties. Vote for right and wrong and not right and left.

Answer 4

definite. i'm in the comparable boat you're in by way of fact i won't be in a position to easily lay down and be a doormat. i became threatened with actual violence final evening in the Wal-mart vehicle parking zone while after witnessing a fender bender. I referred to as the law enforcement officials by way of fact between the drivers did no longer have a drivers license or insurance and admitted being an unlawful. He instructed the different motive force to bypass into the save and make contact with the law enforcement officials so he could screw his old woman on an analogous time as he became long previous. I understand Spanish very properly and referred to as the police. The unlawful alien became threatening me while the police arrived and that i asked the police officer to restrain him. He took a swing at me questioning a cripple with a cane would be an effortless mark. I darn close to killed the fool. A cane makes a astonishing evening stick. Then the police arrested him for multiple offenses and referred to as border patrol to %. up his relatives.

Answer 5

It is ALWAYS better to vote than not to vote. By voting, even if it is the lesser of two evils, you have at least exercised your civic duty. It is unfortunate that more people don't vote. And this is exactly why many of them don't ---- they are not crazy about either. It is also why many resort to voting for a third candidate.

Whatever the reason, make sure you DO vote! I always say, if you don't vote, don't complain later on down the road!! :-)

Answer 6

It better to take one free right we have and vote for the better of candidates. It at least shows that your a live and will look at what you think is better.
If you do not vote you leave it to the people to make all your decisions, this is why in the U.S. we are the worst voting nation in the world.

Answer 7

that is the problem in a democracy. there is a multiple choice of candidats but not a rejection choice. so we need to either choose a bad apple or a bad orange and hope a miracle will happen and it some how becomoes the fertiliser, on which other good crops come up.

Answer 8

Unfortunately, to follow your metaphor; it's better to eat bad quality fruit than it is to starve to death. We could go looking for an honest politician that's a good leader- but who'd run the country while we spent 100 years looking?

Answer 9

Bananas

Answer 10

Orange