details:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070315/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/us_terrorist_confession
2007-03-15 05:17:10 · 12 answers · asked by Not so looney afterall 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I don't believe it's either. They guy's no innocent, but he probably would have confessed to being the second shooter on the grassy knoll if they'd pressed him a little further. I'm not sure what's more offensive- that our government thinks we're stupid enough to believe this; or the suggestion that this clown-shoes outsmarted all of our national security for a decade.
Thank you for posting that link, I hadn't actually seen the news yet, and actually fell out of my chair laughing at the hairy "mastermind".
2007-03-15 05:57:00 · answer #1 · answered by Beardog 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hehas confessed to bombing the WTC and killing Daniel Pearl along with Nuking Hiroshima and Nagasaki and shooting Abraham Lincoln. This guy has probably been tortured to the point he will confess to whatever you tell him.
This is the Bush Regimes opportunity to show they have made progress.
Now we know who really burned the Reichstag
2007-03-15 12:24:47 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Why would he cover for those who are still free, it has been long suspected that he was responsible for those actions. He doesn't have anything to gain by covering for someone that we probably can't catch anyways, no offense to our wonderful military, it is just hard to catch a terrorist in a tribal region of a country you can't gain access to legally.
2007-03-15 12:24:03 · answer #3 · answered by asmith1022_2006 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
He confessed to most everything bad that has happened in US history. Did he steal the Lindbergh baby, too?
2007-03-15 12:48:03 · answer #4 · answered by MishMash [I am not one of your fans] 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Not really. Now he's claiming he killed Daniel Pearl as well as masterminding 9/11. Maybe he wanted a little more attention since he's been locked up for a while now.
2007-03-15 12:21:10 · answer #5 · answered by meathookcook 6 · 5⤊ 1⤋
I believe the confession since it was probably arrived at with the help of some truth drug.
2007-03-15 12:21:24 · answer #6 · answered by edward m 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I'm sure there is an element of both. However, we're not asking him questions that we don't already know the answer to.
He's actually telling us what we already know. Now, we have to get him to tell us stuff that we didn't know.
2007-03-15 12:22:04 · answer #7 · answered by ? 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
nope.. this is just something the government has set up to keep us thinking 911 went down the way it did. If you really do the research and look at the facts, you will see this was a conspiracy and hopefully we can get to the bottom of it someday..
2007-03-15 12:22:29 · answer #8 · answered by aaron b 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋
I am sure some of his confession is true. He was tortured. Sadly for this country, it is not possible to know how much of his confession is true and how much is coerced.
2007-03-15 12:21:10 · answer #9 · answered by oohhbother 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Neither. I believe he's been tortured until confessing to any and every thing asked.
Which is not to say he's an innocent man, just that our government is no longer to be trusted.
2007-03-15 12:20:47 · answer #10 · answered by Studbolt Slickrock Deux 4 · 5⤊ 3⤋