The International Astronomical Union decided that Pluto was no longer a planet. The reason is that while Pluto is round, orbits the sun, and has three moons, it has not cleared (via gravity) its own orbit of debris. Instead, they decided to classify it as a "dwarf planet".
See the details below.
RESOLUTION 5A
The IAU therefore resolves that "planets" and other bodies in our Solar System, except satellites, be defined into three distinct categories in the following way:
(1) A "planet" [footnote 1] is a celestial body that (a) is in orbit around the Sun, (b) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape, and (c) has cleared the neighbourhood around its orbit.
(2) A "dwarf planet" is a celestial body that (a) is in orbit around the Sun, (b) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape [footnote 2] , (c) has not cleared the neighbourhood around its orbit, and (d) is not a satellite.
(3) All other objects [footnote 3] except satellites orbiting the Sun shall be referred to collectively as "Small Solar-System Bodies".
Footnote 1: The eight "planets" are: Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune.
Footnote 2: An IAU process will be established to assign borderline objects into either dwarf planet and other categories.
Footnote 3: These currently include most of the Solar System asteroids, most Trans-Neptunian Objects (TNOs), comets, and other small bodies.
RESOLUTION 6A
The IAU further resolves:
Pluto is a "dwarf planet" by the above definition and is recognized as the prototype of a new category of trans-Neptunian objects.
2007-03-16 12:30:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by Otis F 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Once known as the smallest, coldest, and most distant planet from the Sun, Pluto has a dual identity, not to mention being enshrouded in controversy since its discovery in 1930. On August 24, 2006, the International Astronomical Union (IAU) formally downgraded Pluto from an official planet to a dwarf planet. According to the new rules a planet meets three criteria: it must orbit the Sun, it must be big enough for gravity to squash it into a round ball, and it must have cleared other things out of the way in its orbital neighborhood. The latter measure knocks out Pluto and 2003UB313 (Eris), which orbit among the icy wrecks of the Kuiper Belt, and Ceres, which is in the asteroid belt.
(1) A "planet" is a celestial body that (a) is in orbit around the Sun, (b) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape, and (c) has cleared the neighborhood around its orbit.
(2) A "dwarf planet" is a celestial body that (a) is in orbit around the Sun, (b) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape, (c) has not cleared the neighborhood around its orbit, and (d) is not a satellite.
(3) All other objects except satellites orbiting the Sun shall be referred to collectively as "Small Solar-System Bodies".
2007-03-15 05:13:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by crazyBaby69 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Pluto is now no longer seen a planet depending on the recent words that outline a planet (determined on after more beneficial Pluto-like products were got here across in our photograph voltaic equipment). in spite of the undeniable fact that it continues to be defined as a Dwarf planet, or Plutoid (named after Pluto). A dwarf planet is an merchandise it truly is sufficiently vast to be a planet, yet would not meet all the criteria. The asteroid Ceres is a dwarf planet that lies in the Asteroid belt. A Plutoid is a dwarf planet that lies outdoors the orbit of Pluto. This includes Pluto and also different those days got here across products including Eris and Sedna.
2016-12-02 01:22:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sadly, not. But in any case, while Pluto/Charon are still very much "stable" and logged heavenly bodies in 'our solar system' please never forget to regard them as the, sort of, 'last friendly house'. Because while they are undoubtedly at the edge of the known 'inner' solar system, they are a very long way indeed from the 'edge' of our whole solar system. Which is to say, the area in space which includes celestial bodies that still orbit The Sun.
2007-03-15 13:59:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by Girly Brains 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am very sorry, but Pluto is no longer considered a planet because it "shares" its own space with its large moon Charon, It is more of a double planet system because the point at which Charon orbits Pluto. aka the center of gravity is not even inside Pluto it is above its surface.
2007-03-16 06:37:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by jeevus_ud1991 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, it is now a "dwarf planet".
A dwarf planet is defined by the following conditions:
*is in orbit around the Sun
*has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (near-spherical) shape
*has not cleared the neighbourhood around its orbit
*is not a satellite
Pluto was downgraded because its orbit interstects Neptune.
2007-03-15 05:12:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
No. It's too small and hasn't cleared it's orbit, so it doesn't meet the criteria for being a planet as set out by the International Astronomical Union.
2007-03-15 05:12:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by eri 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
no.
"About 2,500 scientists meeting in Prague have adopted historic new guidelines that see the small, distant world demoted to a secondary category.
The researchers said Pluto failed to dominate its orbit around the Sun in the same way as the other planets. "
2007-03-15 05:17:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by Sue O 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No it's not. It's now called a dwarf planet an its relegated the status of some asteroids.
2007-03-15 05:13:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by Gene 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not any more sadly as I rather liked the name as a planet.
2007-03-15 05:12:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by Scrumpy 3
·
0⤊
0⤋