Where did Dred Scott help?

Answer 1

In effect, the Court ruled that slaves had no claim to freedom; they were property and not citizens; they could not bring suit in federal court; and because slaves were private property, the federal government could not revoke a white slave owner's right to own a slave based on where he lived, thus nullifying the essence of the Missouri Compromise. Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the majority, also ruled that Scott was a slave, an object of private property, and therefore subject to the Fifth Amendment prohibition against taking property from its owner "without due process."

Where did it help? Well that depends on your perspective. What it did was to further divide the country on the issue of slavery. Obvious separation between the North and South existed during this time. The decision in this case was not satisfactory for many northerners, who became angry because Chief Justice Taney, by extending his opinion to include issues that did not have much of a bearing on the case, had unjustly set new precedents. Southerners, of course, stood firmly by the decision of the Court, refusing to concede that any part of Taney's decision had been extrajudicial. The outcome of the Dred Scott case only made matters worse and the nation was on the brink of
Civil War.

So how did it help? Possibly by bringing the issue of slavery to a head. The Missouri Compromise had forstalled the issue which needed to be addressed. This decision helped to lay the groundwork for the Civil War and subsequently end slavery. So in that regard, you could argue that it help to hasten the freedom of the slaves.

Answer 2

Dred Scott v. Sandford,[a million] 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1856)[2], undemanding because the "Dred Scott Case" or the "Dred Scott decision", replaced right into a lawsuit determined by ability of united states best courtroom in 1857 that ruled that folk of African descent, even if or not they were slaves, might want to not in any respect be electorate of united states, and that Congress had no authority to limit slavery in federal territories. the alternative for the courtroom replaced into written by ability of chief Justice Roger Taney.

Answer 3

It definatively showed the differences between the north and south and led to the Civil War.

Good Luck!!!