2007-03-15 04:49:58 · 6 answers · asked by Milosenpotion 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Its a balancing test, sometimes it is, sometimes it isnt.
Our privacy rights have to be invaded sometimes so that we can maintain certain aspects of modern life, i.e. airplane travel.
However, I personally believe that privacy rights should outweigh almost every proposed "security" need. Some people have forgotten that lately and have used certain laws to justify willy-nilly privacy violations (thanks Attorney Gonzalez). Oh well. At least he is apologizing now.
2007-03-15 05:22:30 · answer #1 · answered by EthanHunt 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
DUH
Security is for everyone and privacy is for one or two. Does the good of the one out weigh the good of the many? No.
Security is more valuable than any one persons privacy.
2007-03-15 04:55:38 · answer #2 · answered by Kevin A 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
That may be a trick question. Can't you secure your privacy?
But then look at celebs. They have security but no privacy. mmm makes you think.
Secuirty in the since of saftey, I would rather have
in the since of finacily I rather have privacy.
2007-03-15 04:56:08 · answer #3 · answered by 2shay 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'll take privacy anyday. The more information you let the goverment control the scarier it gets.
The partiot act is the worst bill we ever passed.
2007-03-15 04:52:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The President thinks so.
2007-03-15 04:57:16 · answer #5 · answered by billy 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Y not! GO PATRIOT ACT!
2007-03-15 04:53:23 · answer #6 · answered by Back 4 Revenge 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋