Comparisons over time don't really hold up, but I think more conservatives would champion Smith's ideas than would liberals today
2007-03-15 04:48:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Smith's work helped to create the modern academic discipline of economics and provided one of the best-known intellectual rationales for free trade, capitalism, and libertarianism. He was a Humanist.
Humanists endorse universal morality based on the commonality of human nature, suggesting that solutions to human social and cultural problems cannot be parochial.
2007-03-15 11:56:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
At the time he wrote, Smith was one of the intellecutual giants of what we now call "classical liberalsim.." His ideas, though, are far more profound and far-reaching to fit into a simple categorization.
And that would still be ture today. Smith would look at today's world and do what made him--and the other giants of the Enlightenment--the great minds they were--he would step back and look at the realities--and his opinions and ideas would trancend our simplistic political pigeonholes.
He would, in short, be exactly what he was--a man of REASON--not a follower of ohter peoples preconceived ideas.
2007-03-15 11:54:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Conservative.
2007-03-15 11:50:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by ck4829 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Libertarian.
2007-03-15 11:51:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋