The Democratic plan for Iraq, For votes? or serious war plan.?

Question

Background Washington Post....see link for entire piece

" In short, the Democratic proposal to be taken up this week is an attempt to impose detailed management on a war without regard for the war itself. Will Iraq collapse into unrestrained civil conflict with "massive civilian casualties," as the U.S. intelligence community predicts in the event of a rapid withdrawal? Will al-Qaeda establish a powerful new base for launching attacks on the United States and its allies? Will there be a regional war that sucks in Iraqi neighbors such as Saudi Arabia or Turkey? The House legislation is indifferent: Whether or not any of those events happened, U.S. forces would be gone."



http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/12/AR2007031201198.html

Answer 1

of course for votes.

Answer 2

McCain is purely too average for the Liberal Democrats. no longer something is negotiable, who're you kidding. No way, no how, will they ever vote for him. purely like the Conservatives would by no ability vote for Obama. He hates that the conflict became so mismanaged. He became "ill at heart" on the blunders made. he will no longer end the conflict, the conflict has ended, Iraqis are in the midst of a civil conflict, factions combating one yet another, no longer our troops. he's properly conscious of the region over there. i think of he has a particularly good draw close. i do no longer see him making the comparable blunders bush made. Bush became an entire moron, who became way out of his league.

Answer 3

Let me contain my shock that the Washington Post is critical of the Dems plan. What they conveniently left out is that if Bush had not gotten us into this mess, Iraq would not be in the state it is today. Regardless, Bush will veto any thing that makes it to his desk, so it is more for votes, as Americans are not happy with the war.

Answer 4

How about this for a plan

Leave Iraq
Build our National defenses
This country's readiness for attack is abysmal
When its too late how many will think
Gee's if W hadn't have spent all our money chasing a paper tiger like Saddam, we could have had state of the art protection here in the United States